![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
64.105.136.67
In Reply to: RE: more data for your survey... posted by tunenut on February 28, 2012 at 18:10:41
It's not that I'm against it. I just see it as a frill, and not a viable replacement for traditional approaches to film. I'm sure Scorsese did a better job than Cameron, but the option of putting glasses over my glasses to access what I consider a gimmick is not why I wanted to see this film. For me, it was very profound, personal experience to watch Hugo and 3D wasn't going to add to that experience in a meaningful way. That doesn't mean I have anything technically against 3D or that I oppose it. It's just not for me.
-------------
We must be the change we wish to see in the world. -Gandhi
Edits: 02/28/12Follow Ups:
...and have no clue what you're talking about, but you have a strong opionion about both the film, seen in 2D, and what it might be like in 3D.
Not surprising.
Do you also have a strong opinion on the Magnepan 3.7 speakers you haven't heard, but may have seen a picture of?
LOL!
-------------
We must be the change we wish to see in the world. -Gandhi
...was about the 3D presentation you did not see.
No, you moron, learn to read. I was commenting on my opinion of 3D in a more general way as a gimmick, and I acknowledged right up top that Scorsese's handling of 3D must be exceptional.
Do you enjoy wearing glasses over your glasses? I don't.
Beyond that, you are holding a grudge like Khomeini. Lose it.
-------------
We must be the change we wish to see in the world. -Gandhi
...communication skills haven't improved a bit since your wife stopped letting you post on Outside.
Thankfully we no longer have to put up with you there.
you carry a grudge. Sad. Really.
-------------
We must be the change we wish to see in the world. -Gandhi
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: