Films/DVD Asylum

RE: Can you at least rank 'em? 3, 4, 5 stars? Thanks. nt

68.169.153.252

afilado

In Reply to: RE: Can you at least rank 'em? 3, 4, 5 stars? Thanks. nt posted by tinear on December 17, 2012 at 14:56:40

For a complex of different reasons I enjoyed all these enough to call them "good". Some I would favor over others to watch again.

I'll say with some reluctance that these got my Flix rating of at least 4 stars, only a few 5 stars.

Please spare me your arguments. It's opinion, not competition.

J

Follow Ups:

A tad touchy! I respect your opinion and wanted some sense of where to begin, though I've seen several. nt - tinear 17:04:28 12/17/12 (2)
fds
- RE: A tad touchy! I respect your opinion and wanted some sense of where to begin, though I've seen several. nt - afilado 17:58:52 12/17/12 (1)
  You just can't resist can you?
  
  j
  - Now you quit it. Everybody knows that film appreciation is a zero sum game. - Enophile 08:37:17 12/18/12 (0)
    If one films 'wins,' another must 'lose.'
    
    You should be used to it by now.

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

The Cable Cooker