![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
108.255.78.50
In Reply to: RE: So you admit a truth-test for an actor's speech is bullshit. The Joker by Ledger is posted by tinear on March 16, 2013 at 10:42:27
Obviously Ledger's joker is a totally different animal than Nicholson (in the same way that Bale's Wayne/Batman is a totally different animal than Keaton, but that's because Nolan was fleshing out these characters beyond a cartoon. And Ledger maintained some of the silliness and goofiness of the character--that was part of the performance.
-------------
We must be the change we wish to see in the world. -Gandhi
Follow Ups:
Your answer is just obvious to anyone that's seen the film. Ledger's performance is different in a dramatic sense. As I said (do you blot out meaning because of a rush to argue?), he elevated the character by the consummate skill he showed in his complex portrayal. Is he truly crazy, more so than anyone that cruelly has been disfigured? Is his destructiveness rooted in his childhood, his trauma, or is he one of those fellows Caine described as nihilistic, that they just like to see things destroyed? Or both?
His lying is a key part of his character. Again, does he believe it or not---- that's a fascinating discussion, but several bridges too far for you.
Ledger is a fine choice, and so is Bardem.
Both actors made their characters 'true,' which is why they are so memorable!
Point to Tin.
![]()
As aggressive as your vendetta against me may be, I don't think you want to back tin on this one.
-------------
We must be the change we wish to see in the world. -Gandhi
I wouldn't care if someone said Mickey Rourke in The Wrestler or Robert Downey Jr. as Ironman!
It's kinda up to the indivdual viewer.
Parsing the difference between Bardem's or Ledger's work in either movie is fine....so long as some dipshit fanboy doesn't need to insist one performance 'beat' the other.
I thought Bardem and Ledger (and Rourke and Downey) both filled their roles prefectly!
Please continue your folie a deux with Tin.
![]()
There are many others but I was staying in the villain vein.
If your point is that you don't have any opinion on the matter, then just sit it out and let those of us who found tin to have taken leave of his senses to tell him so. Several did--not just me. Your fanboy comment was bizarre. If you believed that you clearly would be replying to tin same way the rest of us did in the thread. Nice try though.
-------------
We must be the change we wish to see in the world. -Gandhi
Get your points right, angry man.
Learn to read. Then learn to analyze films.
-------------
We must be the change we wish to see in the world. -Gandhi
You can stray from the dark side, too.
-------------
We must be the change we wish to see in the world. -Gandhi
d
Not that I'm terribly motivated to answer your questions.
-------------
We must be the change we wish to see in the world. -Gandhi
*
![]()
and letting ego and obsession define ones perceptions of Art is evidence of immaturiy .
J.B.
Edits: 03/16/13
Which is exactly what you and eno did using different verbiage.
-------------
We must be the change we wish to see in the world. -Gandhi
You're a prize.
Mickey Rourke in Expendables I was also a terrific performance.
;D
![]()
n
I have exactly one.
Mickey's only very good performance was in "Body Heat."
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: