Films/DVD Asylum

"Any solid ideas on how to get this rolling?"

74.138.60.219

volunteer

In Reply to: RE: Will film hobbyists ever go retro-analog? posted by Billy Wonka on April 20, 2014 at 19:23:01

Seems like a certainty to lose money. I don't see it happening.

-Wendell

Follow Ups:

Snob appeal....that's what sells. * - Billy Wonka 07:23:04 04/21/14 (10)
.
- True that, but to get your idea rolling... - musetap 12:49:27 04/21/14 (2)
  Porn may be the answer.
  
  Once that catches on it may expand to other genres.
  
  But IF that catches on, it could keep one SO busy, other genres won't be necessary, dinero-wise.
  
  "Once this was all Black Plasma and Imagination" - Michael McClure
  - The 8 mm porn of the 70's.....those were the days...... - Billy Wonka 15:05:12 04/21/14 (1)
    The Gooey Sprocket Days as such.
    - Heard this at work as I was walking past some fellow... - musetap 20:22:58 04/21/14 (0)
      employees the other day, all male:
      
      "Oh yeah, 70's porn is my favorite porn."
      
      "Once this was all Black Plasma and Imagination" - Michael McClure
- I'm all for it. - volunteer 08:34:26 04/21/14 (0)
  Will you fund the effort?
  
  -Wendell
- My film is wider than yours! - Victor Khomenko 07:26:48 04/21/14 (5)
  Do not despair... there is still that 70mm slot on the top of the heap!
  - 135mm! Paul Allen built himself a cinema in Seattle just to show 3 films. nt - tinear 07:38:05 04/21/14 (4)
    fds
    - "135mm! " In diameter? - Victor Khomenko 07:53:36 04/21/14 (3)
      That is 10mm bigger than the current state-of-the art tank smoothbore cannon, but not as big as 155mm howitzer.
      
      No matter... Abramovich will beat it.
      - Sorry, a quick bit of research showed it as 65mm: - tinear 08:50:40 04/22/14 (0)
        
        In Reply to: RE: "135mm! " In diameter? posted by Victor Khomenko on April 21, 2014 at 07:53:36
        
        "The film was initially planned to be photographed in 3-film-strip Cinerama (like How the West Was Won), because it was a part of a production/distribution deal between MGM and Cinerama Releasing corporation, but that was changed to Super Panavision 70 (which uses a single-strip 65 mm negative) on the advice of special photographic effects supervisor Douglas Trumbull, due to distortion problems with the 3-strip system.[67] Color processing and 35 mm release prints were done using Technicolor's dye transfer process. The 70 mm prints were made by MGM Laboratories, Inc. on Metrocolor. The production was $4.5 million over the initial $6.0 million budget, and sixteen months behind schedule.[61]"
        I saw the film in original release in one of the few theaters that were built with wrap-around screens, a precursor of IMAX of sorts. It was, truly, mind altering (yes, I was in a "receptive" state, and I don't mean just Minnesota�.).
      - I carry a 155 smooth bore. * - Billy Wonka 08:43:13 04/21/14 (1)
        
        In Reply to: RE: "135mm! " In diameter? posted by Victor Khomenko on April 21, 2014 at 07:53:36
        
        .
        
        The bore part, I believe. - tinear 20:16:47 04/22/14 (0)
        
        In Reply to: RE: I carry a 155 smooth bore. * posted by Billy Wonka on April 21, 2014 at 08:43:13
        
        Sorry, I just can't help myself. You know, like the scorpion and the toad?

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Parts Connexion