![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
70.162.135.70
In Reply to: RE: 'San Andreas': Falling buildings, bouncing bosoms . . . posted by Billy Wonka on May 30, 2015 at 13:05:49
...and highly entertaining. Johnson's acting was much better than I expected--and quite good--and the rest of the cast members were convincing. Special effects were high in quality and the story was good enough. It looked great on a 70X30-foot Panavision screen and sounded fabulous (if a bit too loud) with Dolby Atmos.
HIGHLY recommended for a summer popcorn movie. Probably I'll see it again.
I've walked out of probably two-dozen turds; this is NOT one of them.
----------
Tin-eared audiofool, large-scale-Classical music lover, and damned-amateur fotografer.
William Bruce Cameron: "...not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."
Follow Ups:
I like Sci-Fi but ALL disaster movies full of special effects and loud noise are a total waste of time as I see it.
E
T
...in today's special effects/CGI.
I am sure it is. My point is it is a state of the art turd. Disaster movies have been and always will be a waste of time to me. Everyone here knows I like little of what Hollywood has to offer. When special effects are what a particular movie is known for it almost always has substandard everything else.
E
T
Taken for what it is, its great. The computer is the star. CA-based seismic geologists had a hoot over it. I imagine structural engineers would to, but all I've known had android senses of humor. They would laugh if they got it.
I'm a civil engineer, so I get my fun from the structural types. And the electricals.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: