Cameron slams 'Oppenheimer'
162.232.81.100 |
||
| Posted on June 28, 2025 at 14:01:47 | ||
|
Posts: 4054
Joined: April 25, 2013 Contributor Since: October 15, 2013 |
Because it doesn't address the aftermath of the "bomb" on Hiroshima. James plans to do a film memorializing all the carnage and death there. Needless to say, Camerson seems to be conveniently forgetting the death and carnage Japan imposed on Asia in lieu of making a sweeping anti-nuke horror fest designed to raise the world (Academy) conscience to new levels. The point here is that 'Oppenheimer' was a biopic of his personal struggles attempting to do what he could to end the war. It was not a war film, period. Now, there is heavy criticism that the film didn't go far enough and is a "moral cop-out". I disagree. It was a perfect "mission accomplished" and one of the best films ever produced. 'Oppenheimer' deserved every Oscar it got. Maybe that opinion is not shared with everyone who walks the streets of Tinseltown.
|
|
| RE: Cameron slams 'Oppenheimer', posted on June 29, 2025 at 07:18:05 | |
|
Posts: 1927
Location: Oregon Joined: May 18, 2005 |
Check out "The Human Condition" if you haven't already.
|
| "Oppie" was IMAX., posted on July 5, 2025 at 21:30:10 | |
|
Posts: 4054
Joined: April 25, 2013 Contributor Since: October 15, 2013 |
,,
|
| RE: Cameron slams 'Oppenheimer', posted on July 6, 2025 at 08:56:22 | |
|
Posts: 3509
Location: Ohio Joined: June 22, 2008 |
I thought Oppenheimer was just tedious.
|
