Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - An angry Ray Bradbury on Michael Moore - ephemere 12:54:50 06/16/04 (53)

• Well He's right about one thing... - RGA 22:23:20 06/23/04 (0)
• Roger Ebert recently wrote about what a Documentary really is...and Moore. - RGA 11:17:58 06/19/04 (0)
• Re: Nah! - Jeff Starrs 02:53:20 06/17/04 (0)
• Ray Bradbury, respect him as I do, is grossly in error here. - Audiophilander 01:02:30 06/17/04 (45)
• Suppose someone filmed a "documentary" about Moore and titled it "Bodyweight 451"... - Dalton 12:58:40 06/17/04 (2)
• It wouldn't surprise me if Ray were to consider just such a "novel" idea. - Audiophilander 13:16:19 06/17/04 (1)
• Re: It wouldn't surprise me if Ray were to consider just such a "novel" idea. - Peterloplop 18:46:16 06/17/04 (0)
• Re: Not so... - patrickU 06:14:36 06/17/04 (38)
• You are right, Patrick: Bush (and neocons) share the spirit of "Fahrenheit 451"... - orejones 08:52:29 06/17/04 (7)
• Right on. This is what the upcoming US election will be deciding on. Fascism or Democracy. - edta 19:38:41 06/20/04 (0)
• Bravo; good point. (nt) - Audiophilander 11:07:13 06/17/04 (0)
• I've heard there was a movie "Macbeth 2004" being made... - Victor Khomenko 10:12:53 06/17/04 (3)
• What do you know about Macbeth? It seems your knowledge on this matter is as deep as your knowledge about Spain... - orejones 11:49:09 06/17/04 (2)
• He-he.... it obvously hit the right spot! - Victor Khomenko 11:52:39 06/17/04 (1)
• DURAK! nt - Eldragon 16:54:46 06/22/04 (0)
• Re: By now, dear Bernardo... - patrickU 09:07:40 06/17/04 (0)
• That is correct - Victor Khomenko 06:43:45 06/17/04 (29)
• Whether intentional or not, the title evokes an ironic symbolism that's entirely appropriate. - Audiophilander 11:26:14 06/17/04 (27)
• Re: " Whether intentional or not "..Oh boy! what a man of bad faith! - patrickU 23:44:10 06/17/04 (5)
• I was speaking r-h-e-t-o-r-i-c-a-l-l-y! In other words, it was a figure of speech; the ONLY point ... - Audiophilander 15:18:23 06/19/04 (4)
• Re: OK, you are quite right, I will not post here anymore, only on European boards, sorry for the disturbance.....nt - patrickU 01:58:29 06/20/04 (3)
• Sorry patrick, I'm not trying to run you off, but try to be a little less nasty with your insults, okay? - Audiophilander 21:08:22 06/20/04 (2)
• Re: Insults? Well.... - patrickU 09:33:05 06/21/04 (1)
• The "hiding behind..." crack; it not only was an insult directed at me... - Audiophilander 01:26:09 06/24/04 (0)
• You always ready to drop your integrity when that fits your agenda? - Victor Khomenko 11:36:45 06/17/04 (20)
• Re: You always ready to drop your integrity when that fits your agenda? - Analog Scott 12:01:20 06/21/04 (0)
• Hoist by your own petard: Ray Bradbury wrote the book first; the movie IS a separate entity! - Audiophilander 13:07:48 06/17/04 (18)
• Wow! Such great knowledge! Book first! Like wow! Who would imagine. - Victor Khomenko 13:17:00 06/17/04 (17)
• How many books have you published Victor? BTW, electronics pamphlets don't count! - Audiophilander 14:21:57 06/17/04 (16)
• You are so charming when you are clueless and nasty - Victor Khomenko 14:40:02 06/17/04 (15)
• Re: You are so charming when you are clueless and nasty - Analog Scott 12:06:33 06/21/04 (0)
• Read this S-L-O-W-L-Y and then think about it very, very carefully before responding: - Audiophilander 15:30:16 06/17/04 (13)
• One final pointer - Victor Khomenko 06:12:20 06/18/04 (11)
• Re: One final pointer - Analog Scott 12:12:16 06/21/04 (0)
• Since teaching an old Russian wolfhound new tricks requires a great deal more patience than I can muster at the moment: - Audiophilander 15:42:21 06/19/04 (9)
• More homework for a lazy student - Victor Khomenko 18:17:55 06/20/04 (8)
• No offense, but are you really that dense, Victor? - Audiophilander 21:00:48 06/20/04 (7)
• Re: No offense, but are you really that dense, Victor? - Analog Scott 12:16:43 06/21/04 (0)
• Simply caught you with your pants down - Victor Khomenko 04:44:22 06/21/04 (5)
• The "source" was simply for your benefit; I already knew you were wrong on this. - Audiophilander 08:57:42 06/21/04 (4)
• Ahem... you will never bother to learn, apparently. - Victor Khomenko 09:23:37 06/21/04 (3)
• Sheeeeeeesh! He employed NO DUE DILIGENCE in stopping others from borrowing reference to his book's title! - Audiophilander 11:50:27 06/21/04 (2)
• But your Honor, murders have been commited before! Why judge me? - Victor Khomenko 12:04:02 06/21/04 (1)
• Yes, "Fahrenheit 452" could even be legally used in some instances (i.e., as in a parody of the author's original work)! - Audiophilander 12:17:57 06/21/04 (0)
• You're both right. - ephemere 19:51:39 06/17/04 (0)
• Re: I had the moral, you, the background of his behavior... - patrickU 07:16:15 06/17/04 (0)
• Re: Ray Bradbury, respect him as I do, is grossly in error here. - grinagog 01:41:33 06/17/04 (2)
• I like the orchid story better also. - J.R. 04:20:03 06/17/04 (1)
• I have a neighbour with a very Rare Cycad - grinagog 04:56:10 06/17/04 (0)
• Re: An angry Ray Bradbury on Michael Moore - SR 13:51:17 06/16/04 (3)
• Re: Nice or not.... - patrickU 07:21:36 06/17/04 (0)
• A propagandist in whose pay? The man has integrity. - edta 18:22:20 06/16/04 (1)
• Re: A propagandist in whose pay? The man has integrity. - SR 19:43:53 06/16/04 (0)

Follow Ups

• Re: Nah! - Jeff Starrs 02:53:20 06/17/04 (0)