Home Video Asylum

TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more.

question on non-progressive players....

Since my TV is non-progressive, I'm wondering if I should be looking at progressive players at all? Does the de-interlacer get in my way, video performance-wise? Could I get better 480i (whatever) output from a non-progressive player than a progressive one? Do progressive players inherently have compromised interlaced (not non-interaced) output? I understand - just like with audio DACs - it's the implementation of the technology - rather than the technology itself - that determines the "real" quality of the final output.

>>You could use your EVS DAC for CD, it would look much better
>>(with good source material, most) than VHS, so don't get too
>>caught up in the high end features

Do I even need a player with the Sage/Faroudja FI2200 chip? That's just the deinteracer, right? Not the MPEG decoder, correct? Does the chroma "bug" effect me since I can't view progressive material? I thought it still would. My ETA for a HDTV is currently 3-5 years at best.

I can feed toslink into my AA DTI-PRO, which feeds my EVS DAC.

>>Then you will have a better appreciation of what capability
>>you are buying for the next time, before sinking big bucks
>>in a virtually daily changing technology.

That's pretty much my concern at this point. If the denon will last me three years, I'll get it. Decent analog outputs and DVD-A. That seems like an "OK" investment of $500. but if it will be embarrassed buy the new $200 players at January 2003 CES (summer 2003 release), video wise - then it's a not-so-hot investment. Even considering the audio. In that case, I'd be better of with an outboard DAC. Then I could just keep upgrading the transport and video sections. but if the Denon is going to be "about as good as it gets" for the next few years. The pendullum swings back to the denon.

Also consider john Johnson's review of the Denon DVD-1600 at Secret's website. Specifically the following quote:

...but as you will see below, I am making the Denon DVD-1600 my reference DVD player because it passed just about every one of our Benchmark tests.

Would the Panasonic RP56 not do as well? I think their [secrets] review of the RP56 listed some "combing" issues during their "Abyss" DVD tests. Here's a link to that review.
did the Denon passt his test? It doesn't look like JJ performed that tests on the DVD-1600.

Assuming the DVD-1600 performs no better (or no better than it would matter to me), it's whether the audio of the Denon is worth $300 more than the RP56. (also DVD-A) Hmmm. There's a bit more to think about than I initally thought. That's both good and bad. heheheh.

>>[Dang, I'm having trouble saying what I mean today...]

Don't worry. It's seems that I'm not doing much better myself! LOL.

:-)


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  McShane Design  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.