![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
72.237.127.253
cynical a story as you could want... but the arguments over the greatness of this noir rests on the leading man, Dick Powell.
Powell's career was nose-diving: he was a song-and-dance guy and this was his lifeline. It turned out he held on and went on to a new career as a dramatic leading man.
He doesn't "do" a very good Philip Marlowe, in my opinion. He's too civilized, too... nice.
Bogart was no-nonsense. He projected anger, distrust... toughness. I believed Bogart could casually shoot a guy down, after kicking in his teeth. Powell? Nah. He's the guy in the nice suit, downing martini after martini as he traded witticisms with his satin-gowned wife and petted his cute dog, "Asta."
He's not terrible, mind you, he does what he could. He's just the wrong guy.
Still, it's a terrific film. He just isn't... menacing.
No, Powell is great. He is no Bogart, he is an everyman in a world of double-crossing and betrayal...no he is not a tough guy, but he is tough in an ordinary way. A lot better than his former song-and-dance persona would lead you to believe.
Powell? I'm confused.
of Dana Andrews.
None of these three guys projected menace: I just can't see them as hard-boiled gumshoes.
They were in some fine films, yes, and their performances were good it's just I think they were miscast.
Bogart and Mitchum (and several others) truly look and act tough, you don't have to suspend belief.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: