Both those directors have great appeal for actors to "work" with.

That's all.

I think Pitt would want to work with them more than they would want to work with him.

He brings in $tar factor, they add a certain legitimacy to his resume.

Business as usual.

"...You're all welcome to stay for the next set...we're going to play all the same tunes, but in different keys..." -Count Basie

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Well, Brad Pitt haters, top-shelf directors don't share your feeling: - tinear 18:46:26 01/04/09 (13)

Both those directors have great appeal for actors to "work" with. - musetap 17:37:41 01/05/09 (0)

That doesn't say much.... - PdL 14:47:25 01/05/09 (0)

He were good playing Dracula...some vampire anyway. [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 11:37:20 01/05/09 (0)

RE: Top-shelf directors --Are they? - patrickU 09:47:51 01/05/09 (0)

UM...means nothing...directors don't always pick and approve the actors //nt - MaxwellP 19:13:28 01/04/09 (8)

These auteurs pick everything. Everything. They have the power. nt - tinear 19:41:53 01/04/09 (7)

Yes, but... - The Duke 10:07:15 01/06/09 (1)

You put a finger on my problem with Malick. The actors all - tinear 21:25:19 01/06/09 (0)

Star power can make or break the financing.....you go with the safe bet--if requested. * - mr grits 20:45:44 01/04/09 (3)

You and Max keep muttering generalities. Tarantino and Malick have NO such - tinear 08:16:26 01/05/09 (2)

Malick tanked on his last one: New World * - mr grits 11:32:43 01/05/09 (1)

RE: Malick tanked on his last one: New World * - The Duke 10:10:48 01/06/09 (0)

and Santa puts the presents under the tree..auteurship is more complex now...at times it's actor as auteur/nt - MaxwellP 19:47:48 01/04/09 (0)

Follow Ups

Both those directors have great appeal for actors to "work" with. - musetap 17:37:41 01/05/09 (0)

Both those directors have great appeal for actors to "work" with.

Post a Message!