Certainly not but, it was entertaining.

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Is "Titanic" great art, too? And that Terminator film of Cameron's? nt - tinear 08:05:29 01/07/10 (38)

"Titanic" was a wet fart, though "Terminator" was imaginative. ~t - mpathus 01:30:05 01/11/10 (0)

Yes. They are. - grantv 12:28:59 01/08/10 (0)

At least we know where Cameron got the idea for blue people n - DWPC 10:19:33 01/08/10 (0)

Is 'Great Art' entertaining? Do 'Great Artists' make 'Great Art' for the public or other artists? [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 09:37:39 01/08/10 (1)

Neither. Artists make art for themselves. nt - tinear 12:41:39 01/08/10 (0)

RE: Is it not a waste of time, talking with people who would say there are no differences- - patrickU 06:39:04 01/08/10 (0)

The ship sank real good. - Harmonia 18:10:25 01/07/10 (9)

If "Titanic" had been in 3-D, some here would compare it to "Hamlet." nt - tinear 21:16:03 01/07/10 (6)

if it had been 16 mm, from Brazil, and obscure, others would praise its humanity (NT) - tunenut 07:36:45 01/08/10 (3)

Not really. Which particular film do you have in mind, if any - tinear 09:13:10 01/09/10 (1)

none - tunenut 13:14:17 01/09/10 (0)

RE: if it had been 16 mm, from Brazil, and obscure, others would praise its humanity (NT) - Wendell Narrod 07:41:02 01/08/10 (0)

RE: If "Titanic" had been in 3-D, some here would compare it to "Hamlet." nt - Wendell Narrod 04:10:59 01/08/10 (0)

tinear, if you keep this up folks might even start comparing YOU to Hamlet. ;O) - Audiophilander 23:41:01 01/07/10 (0)

Shot in Cameron's gold bath tub. * - mr grits 21:00:46 01/07/10 (1)

Best thing about the production of Titanic was... - Harmonia 14:38:43 01/08/10 (0)

Certainly not but, it was entertaining. - Wendell Narrod 15:35:21 01/07/10 (1)

RE: Certainly not but, it was entertaining. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 09:33:22 01/08/10 (0)

RE: I Just had a 10 minutes " Titanic " view- - patrickU 12:19:19 01/07/10 (0)

Let's put it this way: Cameron's films don't disappoint the fans. - Audiophilander 10:05:51 01/07/10 (18)

Your point is taken but . . . - Daryl Zero 18:25:35 01/07/10 (8)

RE: Your point is taken but . . . - patrickU 06:41:09 01/08/10 (0)

"PT Barnum had that explanation. " - Wendell Narrod 18:29:39 01/07/10 (6)

I think your forgetting . . . - Daryl Zero 19:25:19 01/07/10 (5)

RE: I think your forgetting . . . - Wendell Narrod 04:02:22 01/08/10 (4)

Well, you tell me . . - Daryl Zero 05:47:58 01/08/10 (3)

RE: Well, you tell me . . - Wendell Narrod 05:57:39 01/08/10 (2)

So, what's your argument? - Daryl Zero 06:56:57 01/08/10 (1)

RE: So, what's your argument? - Wendell Narrod 06:58:59 01/08/10 (0)

You seem unwilling or unable to see the difference between cartooning and painting. - tinear 10:50:10 01/07/10 (8)

No, "insidious" is being a second rate armchair critic determined to insult the tastes ... - Audiophilander 23:13:38 01/07/10 (2)

I've seen your paintings. Like I said, you don't know the difference between - tinear 21:13:11 01/10/10 (1)

We've seen your posts here; to say your art appreciation skills are somewhat lacking would be an understatement. (nt) - Audiophilander 23:19:36 01/14/10 (0)

Not necessarilyâ€¦ - David Aiken 22:33:52 01/07/10 (1)

Well stated POV. - Audiophilander 23:35:24 01/07/10 (0)

RE: You are wasting your time. nt - patrickU 12:20:23 01/07/10 (2)

What is it that everyone likes giving but no one likes to receive? - tinear 14:01:27 01/07/10 (1)

RE: What is it that everyone likes giving but no one likes to receive? - patrickU 01:14:58 01/08/10 (0)

Follow Ups

Certainly not but, it was entertaining. - Wendell Narrod 15:35:21 01/07/10 (1)

RE: Certainly not but, it was entertaining. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 09:33:22 01/08/10 (0)

Post a Message!