Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Any reports on the latest "Robin Hood"? - Mike K 22:34:41 05/14/10 (27)

• I was unawares of this part of the story . . . - mr grits 20:52:48 05/20/10 (0)
• RE: Any reports on the latest "Robin Hood"? - apollo66 20:11:05 05/15/10 (0)
• RE: Any reports on the latest "Robin Hood"? - patrickU 11:33:12 05/15/10 (5)
• A British TV Series from the 1980's - ArdRi 14:05:59 05/15/10 (4)
• Resembles a high school production, I'm afraid.......nt - afilado 16:56:35 05/19/10 (2)
• What? have you seen it? Anything but - ArdRi 20:05:40 05/19/10 (1)
• I don't know nuthin'........ - afilado 20:43:04 05/19/10 (0)
• RE: A British TV Series from the 1980's - patrickU 01:33:56 05/16/10 (0)
• JUst been to see it - dave c 05:10:56 05/15/10 (18)
• Does the sun come out? - Tom Brennan 07:44:29 05/15/10 (17)
• I thought that was.... yeah... you're right - dave c 14:20:51 05/15/10 (16)
• Ebert mentions lots of ultra-violence, including juicy decapitations. Did - tinear 14:41:25 05/15/10 (15)
• A decapitation without a head coming off - dave c 19:48:57 05/15/10 (11)
• There is a very large experiential difference between reading - tinear 11:18:20 05/16/10 (10)
• very little blood - dave c 13:27:01 05/16/10 (9)
• Well, for me, it'll be "The Silence of the Lambs." Enough crappy - tinear 14:49:58 05/16/10 (7)
• Very scathing analysis... - dave c 19:29:16 05/16/10 (6)
• I've never drunk a shit shake, either. You'd drink one to form an opinion? nt - tinear 09:24:42 05/17/10 (5)
• See it, don't see it, why would you want to write about eating shit? - dave c 13:45:33 05/17/10 (4)
• Because the film is of that quality. BTW, I didn't invent that metaphor. It may help - tinear 07:50:17 05/21/10 (0)
• This place ..... - afilado 20:46:01 05/19/10 (0)
• RE: See it, don't see it, why would you want to write about eating shit? - mpathus 18:29:14 05/17/10 (1)
• Good choice... - dave c 20:56:23 05/17/10 (0)
• "A lost lamb of a film".... - afilado 13:51:52 05/16/10 (0)
• Review here mentions a lot of violent acts, but - Road Warrior 16:10:06 05/15/10 (2)
• Who could pass up Crowe in tights? :-) nt - tinear 17:47:13 05/15/10 (1)
• That'll save me the cost of lunch... ;-))) nt - dave c 19:49:34 05/15/10 (0)

Follow Ups

• I thought that was.... yeah... you're right - dave c 14:20:51 05/15/10 (16)
• Ebert mentions lots of ultra-violence, including juicy decapitations. Did - tinear 14:41:25 05/15/10 (15)
• A decapitation without a head coming off - dave c 19:48:57 05/15/10 (11)
• There is a very large experiential difference between reading - tinear 11:18:20 05/16/10 (10)
• very little blood - dave c 13:27:01 05/16/10 (9)
• Well, for me, it'll be "The Silence of the Lambs." Enough crappy - tinear 14:49:58 05/16/10 (7)
• Very scathing analysis... - dave c 19:29:16 05/16/10 (6)
• I've never drunk a shit shake, either. You'd drink one to form an opinion? nt - tinear 09:24:42 05/17/10 (5)
• See it, don't see it, why would you want to write about eating shit? - dave c 13:45:33 05/17/10 (4)
• Because the film is of that quality. BTW, I didn't invent that metaphor. It may help - tinear 07:50:17 05/21/10 (0)
• This place ..... - afilado 20:46:01 05/19/10 (0)
• RE: See it, don't see it, why would you want to write about eating shit? - mpathus 18:29:14 05/17/10 (1)
• Good choice... - dave c 20:56:23 05/17/10 (0)
• "A lost lamb of a film".... - afilado 13:51:52 05/16/10 (0)
• Review here mentions a lot of violent acts, but - Road Warrior 16:10:06 05/15/10 (2)
• Who could pass up Crowe in tights? :-) nt - tinear 17:47:13 05/15/10 (1)
• That'll save me the cost of lunch... ;-))) nt - dave c 19:49:34 05/15/10 (0)