Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - 'Side Effects': Welcome to SSRI Land . . . - mr grits 17:11:03 02/08/13 (30)

• fantastic and no spoilers here... - tunenut 17:41:25 02/12/13 (0)
• RE: 'Side Effects': Welcome to SSRI Land . . . - oldmkvi 17:15:29 02/10/13 (10)
• response- spoilers - tunenut 17:38:42 02/12/13 (8)
• Yes, I see that now. Still, ( same spoiler as before) - oldmkvi 20:59:08 02/12/13 (7)
• Spoiler explanation... - mkuller 15:59:41 02/19/13 (0)
• RE: Yes, I see that now. Still, ( same spoiler as before).....Try this take... - Steve O 07:11:51 02/13/13 (5)
• Yet more spoiler type discussion - tunenut 11:34:36 02/13/13 (4)
• "...risky to a lunatic degree..." - Steve O 12:51:15 02/13/13 (3)
• opinions....yet more spoilage... - tunenut 15:09:48 02/13/13 (2)
• AhHa... - Steve O 15:39:14 02/13/13 (1)
• Great Discussion Everyone!!!! Thanks! nt - oldmkvi 08:00:59 02/14/13 (0)
• Just saw it for the second time and it was (spoilers) . . . - mr grits 17:00:06 02/11/13 (0)
• also: for a complicated story it was easy to follow, kudos to Soderburgh for that - PhilJ 15:31:23 02/10/13 (0)
• I was: lethargic / curious / titillated then satisfied, pretty good indeed - PhilJ 11:06:04 02/09/13 (15)
• "Soft focus"? I must be getting old......I thouught it was dim. * - mr grits 13:32:27 02/09/13 (5)
• You are right! - mr grits 17:01:40 02/11/13 (1)
• seems like he uses that effect in all his films, I was wondering if it is the effect of actual film vs digital - PhilJ 12:45:42 02/12/13 (0)
• YOU are dim. nt - tinear 14:34:58 02/11/13 (1)
• Thank you, tin, may I have another? * - mr grits 18:08:31 02/11/13 (0)
• funny, I do not know where I got that term, soft lighting maybe? - PhilJ 14:39:05 02/09/13 (0)
• btw I would not read about this film, just go see it without a heads up imo - PhilJ 11:09:32 02/09/13 (8)
• Absolutely!... - Steve O 20:37:33 02/09/13 (6)
• Not sure if there are real clues to everything . . . - mr grits 14:41:01 02/10/13 (5)
• Grits and Steve-Please post your reactions to seeing it again! - oldmkvi 18:17:53 02/10/13 (3)
• In the mean time check this out... - Steve O 18:49:04 02/10/13 (2)
• Cool! And thanks for the Java tip. If - oldmkvi 19:49:44 02/10/13 (1)
• I read it but I'm reluctant to comment at this time for two reasons... - Steve O 20:19:41 02/10/13 (0)
• Might be why I missed 'em . . . - Steve O 17:14:11 02/10/13 (0)
• I'm about to take your advice! nt - oldmkvi 15:38:48 02/09/13 (0)
• Soderbergh's greatest film, one of the best depiction of ordinary American life, is "Bubble." I'll see this - tinear 19:06:09 02/08/13 (0)

Follow Ups

• I was: lethargic / curious / titillated then satisfied, pretty good indeed - PhilJ 11:06:04 02/09/13 (15)
• "Soft focus"? I must be getting old......I thouught it was dim. * - mr grits 13:32:27 02/09/13 (5)
• You are right! - mr grits 17:01:40 02/11/13 (1)
• seems like he uses that effect in all his films, I was wondering if it is the effect of actual film vs digital - PhilJ 12:45:42 02/12/13 (0)
• YOU are dim. nt - tinear 14:34:58 02/11/13 (1)
• Thank you, tin, may I have another? * - mr grits 18:08:31 02/11/13 (0)
• funny, I do not know where I got that term, soft lighting maybe? - PhilJ 14:39:05 02/09/13 (0)
• btw I would not read about this film, just go see it without a heads up imo - PhilJ 11:09:32 02/09/13 (8)
• Absolutely!... - Steve O 20:37:33 02/09/13 (6)
• Not sure if there are real clues to everything . . . - mr grits 14:41:01 02/10/13 (5)
• Grits and Steve-Please post your reactions to seeing it again! - oldmkvi 18:17:53 02/10/13 (3)
• In the mean time check this out... - Steve O 18:49:04 02/10/13 (2)
• Cool! And thanks for the Java tip. If - oldmkvi 19:49:44 02/10/13 (1)
• I read it but I'm reluctant to comment at this time for two reasons... - Steve O 20:19:41 02/10/13 (0)
• Might be why I missed 'em . . . - Steve O 17:14:11 02/10/13 (0)
• I'm about to take your advice! nt - oldmkvi 15:38:48 02/09/13 (0)