Home Video Asylum

TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  All  Email ] [ Video Asylum ]
[ Alert Moderator ]

Nonsense

That's a lot of crap. The extra space isn't needed unless one wishes to use MPEG2, which seems to be Sony's preference. Newer, more efficient codecs like VC-1 or AMV use much less space and require less of a bitrate. For all of BD's technical "superiority", they can't produce a picture better than HD DVD. At best they can equal it. As far as space goes, Universal got Jackson's king kong,3 hrs. 8 mins, on a disc, and it is considered by many to be reference quality.

>>>I've just started this game, but so far, Blu-Ray whacks HD-DVD based on all three (3) HD-DVDs<<<
Then do your homework. The only way to compare them is with the same movie-Warner's movies look the same on both formats. Same codec and transfer for both.
Most people who own both consider them comperable, or prefer HD DVD for PQ and BD for AQ.
In the mean time, BDA still hasn't even finalized the specs for Blu-ray. It was supposed to be done by June, but they pushed it back until October 31. That's why BD isn't getting all of Warner's movies. BTW, this may also mean that many/ most BD players will be obsolete by Oct. 31.
enjoy,
Jack

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Crux Audio  

Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
FAQ

Post a Message!

 Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.

[ Top Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]