Home Video Asylum

TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more.

one format: time to trim the fat

First of all, lossy audio as the main audio codec.
Guess that's a given since there's really no need for it when movie encodes have a 48Mb/s usable transfer rate and 50GB of storage to play with on Blu-ray.

Second, the use of VC-1 as a video codec.
Using the link below (it's to the main page, just click on the Blu-ray Statistics or HD DVD Statistics links at the top of the page, use the Filter function to, uh... filter), check out some interesting statistics. #1, if you use non-exclusive Blu-ray studios for releases in 2007, AVC and MPEG2 combined account for nearly 70% of the total titles. #2, releases in 2007 for exclusive Blu-ray studios shows AVC = 65%, MPEG2 = 27% and VC-1 = 6%. #3, looking at Paramount's total 2007 releases, which include both Blu-ray and HD DVD titles, AVC accounts for over 60% of their titles. But even more interesting is when you look at Paramount's exclusive HD DVD releases after the "lock-down" in 2007 -- AVC accounts for nearly 89% of their releases.

It seems that Microsoft's codec doesn't rate so well on Blu-ray, unless you're Warner Bros or, of course, Universal on HD DVD. However, now that Microsoft wants a promise of download commitments in order for them to provide VC-1 support to a studio, it may not be long before Warner Bros and Universal push away the head that's been bobbin' up'n'down below their waists for the last 20 months.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Schiit Audio  


Topic - one format: time to trim the fat - Joe Murphy Jr 20:26:05 02/17/08 (0)

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.