![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
I can honestly say that I've never seen a movie like Mystic River, at least not that I can remember. Most of the lead performances are excellent, the plot is well-constructed, overall, and I didn't like it one bit.In the first ten minutes we are introduced to characters who are immediately ruined, before we care one whit about them. This feels at once rushed and manipulative, and by the end of the movie it feels even more rushed than it does initially, because the last ten minutes--about which more later--could easily be lopped off to at least give us some sense, any sense, of the salient characters before they're carted off screen and destroyed. The solitary instance of contact we see between Sean Penn and his daughter is only creepy, not endearing, because it looks like they might as well be on their way to making out. The daughter is extremely cute, by the way, so it would've been nicer to see more of her (hee hee), although this probably would've meant being weirded out by her relationship with her dad for still longer. As it is, we see her once, twice, then presto she's dead. I tried my best to be care, but couldn't, because I was too busy feeling bullied by the swelling strings, which come to Clint's aid whenever he's unsure that mere human suffering will be enough to cue the appropriate feelings.
Like I said, the lead performances are mostly excellent, the exceptions being the two wives, Marcia Gay Harden and Laura Linney. Marcia Gay spends most of the film being flustered and suspicious, and either waving her hands chest high or cupping her mouth in her hand. Given that we have no reason to think she's ever been otherwise than entirely neurotic, it's a wonder that her relationship with her husband hasn't borne some unfortunate fruit before now. As it is, the whole denouement of the film is mostly her fault, which is just plain silly. Laura Linney, meanwhile, might as well be acting in another movie, because the things that actually happen in this one seem at best to only remotely concern her, and mostly to just plain annoy her. Her step-daughter has been brutally murdered, and her husband is falling apart emotionally: what a pain in the ass, huh?
Laurence Fishburne threatens to overwhelm an unusually un-irritating Kevin Bacon at every turn, which is too bad because it's probably Bacon's best role...except for the fact that he is one half of the most superfluous, cloying subplot in the film, the other half being his wife, or rather a close up of her lips. When we finally get to meet her, she looks like some plastic surgery hobbyist, and she is vacantly useless to boot. Why is she there? Why do we care about her? I don't know.
Tim Robbins and Sean Penn do a fantastic job, although Tim is given a few monologues--having to do with, no shit, vampires and werewolves--that elicited audible laughter from the audience. Sean Penn is thankfully given none, although there are some bits of overacting that wouldn't be so bad were it not for the aofrementioned CAN YOU FEEL THE DRAMA string swells.
Oh, and people seem to smile at really inappropriate moments.
But never mind all that: the film would be merely a decent, if largely unaffecting, drama, were it not for the last ten minutes. I haven't read the book, so I don't know what happens, but I can tell you what happens in the film, which is that everything suddenly becomes incredibly weird. Kevin Bacon, a cop, fails to arrest Sean Penn, who has just confessed to killing their childhood friend. Then Kevin's wife calls, and Kevin, entirely unaffected by either Dave's death or his uncharacteristic failure to arrest his admitted killer, has a happily-ever-after moment that is inappropriate, unnecessary, and contrived in the extreme, exacerbated by the fact that the woman who plays his life can't even get her lips to act convincingly. Then things just go flat strange for about five minutes. The moral gravity that has complicated each character for the preceding two hours dissipates, and everyone becomes a sleazy, amoral cipher. Sean Penn's wife delivers one of the most callous few moments of dialogue I've ever seen in a movie, brushing off the murder of her cousin's husband and lauding her childhood-friend-killing husband by saying that he has "four hearts" (??), and then she and Sean Penn have a disconcerting, it's-good-to-be-evil makeout session, before the movie winds down into its final few moments of what-the-hell-is-going on weirdness, wherein the lead characters all wordlessly stare at Marcia Gay, who wanders hysterically through a parade, looking for her dead husband and trying to comfort her depressed, gay-looking son.Then Kevin Bacon makes an imaginary shooting-you-with-a-pistol gesture at Sean Penn, who, just to remind you, has recently confessed to killing their childhood friend, and Sean Penn makes this hey-don't-look-at-me gesture back, and then the movie is over. I was left blinking and feeling weirdly disembodied. It was the single most anti-climactic ending I've ever seen, so entirely out of step with the rest of the movie I think it must've either been tacked on without Clint's knowledge, or a symptom of senility. I suppose it's supposed to be open-ended--Marcia Gay and her impendingly gay son go after Sean and the "Savage brothers" (which, by the way, is one of the dumbest screen names on record) and blow away Laura Linney to boot, who responds by rolling her eyes in irritation before expiring, or something--but really it only serves to contradict the preceding film and make you feel like you've just wasted money and time on something that was resolutely unmoving to begin with.
All that said, please go see this film, so that we can talk about how bizarre the ending is, and how mysterious it is that every critic in America seems not to notice this, and in fact seems to think the rest of the film is something it simply is not, which is to say an affecting morality tale. My only guess is that they must've been won over by the string swells.
![]()
Follow Ups:
I thought the last 10 minutes was the kicker. Especially Linney's speech, that long look between Linney and Harden during the parade (the film isn't just about the guy's loyalty, y'know)...and, of course, Bacon's parting "shot" to Penn, the one that says this ain't over, it'll never be over, I'm gonna get you yet.Isn't that the theme of the film? It's never over for these guys? The tragic past spiralling down to the present and on into the future?
It's not a whodunit anyway. I saw sufficient screen time for the duaghter to feel some sympathy...but the movie's not about *her*.
I liked Mystic River a lot. It's a character study.
Look at it this way - did Laura Croft Tomb Raider inspire you to write so many paragraphs???
It conveys nothing but an unjustifiable emotional coldness on the part of Linney, which to me rings hollow in the context of the film. I agree that it's a character study, but it's a character study, as critics have pointed out ad infinitum, about the rippling effects of violence. We don't have enough contact with the characters who get wrecked and worse at the beginning of the film to feel any impact from the events. And the end of the film, to me, empties everyone out. It renders them, like I said, amoral ciphers. I really don't care much about amoral ciphers, and I fail to understand how we are supposed to *feel* how this could be a lingering effect of Dave's abduction, in particular, because that is so rushed through at the beginning of the film we have no sense of the shape of the immediate effects. How long did these kids really know each other to begin with? How much of the story did they find out? The causality from Dave's abduction to Jimmy's criminality and Sean's emotional distance is shoddy, you have to make quite a leap to even associate those with this childhood event that is tidily trotted out, dressed up with syrupy strings, and then quickly passed over to move on to the next catastrophe, which is treated likewise. And the whole film seems to be built around giving these characters a moral weight and complexity which dissipates all of a sudden at the end of the film. No one cares about Dave's murder. That is callous and weird. Laura Linney's speech might've been more effective if there was some hint of ambivalence, but she comes across like a seasoned mob wife or something. I mean, this is someone she knows, and she responds to the whole thing so breezily, and then they make out, smiling, like it's no big deal. I just didn't get it. And the thing with Sean's wife is just dumb, and the fact that Sean is similarly unfazed, and upon hearing about Dave's death actually seems immediately unburdened enough to come clean with his estranged and superfluous wife...huh? What is that about?I really wanted to like it. I went in with high hopes. I think it's better put-together than most dramas, but ultimately I just found it rather empty and confused--confused, not complicated or filled with ambivalence, which is what I think Eastwood was supposed to be going for.
![]()
and while I don't like too many reviews I thought this one did an excellent job of critiquing the film.
![]()
I guess I'd checked out of the plot by that point...to find out that it hinged on the contrivance of an undiscovered second murder and to find to boot that the main murder was basically a random accident...this was a big letdown after a well-done setup...so I gave up on plot and somehow just accepted that Kevin Bacon's wife would now start talking (this was all quite ludicrous and unnecessary anyway). And Kevin Bacon, cop, letting Sean Penn, murderer, off the hook? Maybe it was sympathy for the loss of his daughter, maybe it was the old childhood bond, maybe it was the known fact that "Dave" had also been a murderer...but I really didn't care too much, the dramatic logic had fallen apart anyway so it could be any reason or even something entirely else. I respect the craft behind this story, but the story itself left me entirely unmoved. And that's really bad...
![]()
Remember the Adrian Lyne film with Dick Gere and Diane Lane from, what, last year or so? From your review, it and Mystic River seem to have the same weirdly and outrageoulsy immoral endng in common.
Written by, about, and for fatuous, out-of-touch, rich people. The improbability of their getting away with the crime committed is dumbfoundingly preposterous (how did he get night-access to the dump? wouldn't her fingerprints have been all over the apartment? his all over the elevator?); Lane and Gear's willingness to move on together despite her infidelity and his murder leaves one darkly pondering the moral universe of the film's writers and intended audience (and the final scene ending with their resolution in a parked car next to a police station is soooo contrived). There are some nice touches along the way, though. Lane does do a great job (and she is gorgeous), and showing her first sexual encounter by flashback on her train ride back from Manhattan was brilliantly and succinct, the fact of her infidelity subordinated to her reflectin on it after the fact: the scene cuts between her ambivalent recollection (tearful laughter; alternations between shame and joy--"God, what have I done" and "damn, that was great") and her equally ambivalent surrender to seduction (at her beau's ridiculous SoHo loft, full, I might add, with his ridiculous book collection--in one scene, the Strand never looked so good).
![]()
--Written by, about, and for fatuous, out-of-touch, rich people.
Though it's been more than ten years, I don't think that characterizes Tolstoy at all.
![]()
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: