Films/DVD Asylum

LOL! Al Gore has OBVIOUSLY seen it! No ofense, but YOU are one of the few folks who post 2nd & 3rd hand opinions here!

24.0.34.251

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display All Email ] [ Films/DVD Asylum ]

Audiophilander

(A)

In Reply to: The question is not whether *I*, but whether *Al Gore* has sat through it. nt posted by clarkjohnsen on May 30, 2004 at 10:36:27:

>>> "The question is not whether *I*, but rather *Al Gore* has sat through it." <<<
To the contrary, that was NOT the question *I* asked of YOU! I asked if you had seen this film because your inference about Gore's recommending it was of a critical nature. You've managed to avoid answering my question through a rather clumsy attempt at misdirection; I reiterate, have YOU seen it?
AuPh

Follow Ups:

Re: I have not see it, but I wanna bet it PURE Kaka. nt - patrickU 13:11:26 05/30/04 (0)
nt
Don't be dense. I was referring to an article in the paper yesterday... - clarkjohnsen 13:11:11 05/30/04 (1)
...probably on-line somewhere too... about Al going on and on about what an *important* movie it is and how *everyone* should see it who wishes to have *any grasp* of *environmental science*, a true *must see* movie.
Come to think, he sounded a lot like you.
Is that why you hated me quoting him?
clark
PS Note I gave no view of my own on DAT.
- Don't be coy ...or any other kind of fish! You KNOW what you were doing Clark, so quit playing innocent and fess up. - Audiophilander 16:24:33 05/30/04 (0)
  You were using albee33's derogatory remarks for a dig at Al Gore when you haven't even seen the movie yourself! If you HAD seen the movie then at least your opportunistic chime-in would've had 1st hand support to lend creedence to your snarky zinger, but since you obviously haven't seen The Day After Tomorrow your remark is just another cheap-shot.
  AuPh

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Kimber Kable

You can not post to an archived thread.