![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
24.91.201.174
'); } // End --> |
In Reply to: Re: Starman isn't a bad SF film, in spite of its somewhat predictable melodramatic elements, ... posted by patrickU on March 18, 2005 at 09:03:29:
I agree but his point is that Carpenter's is closer to the original story.
![]()
Follow Ups:
That was not only this one point! As I did nor read the novel, I could say nothing about this. But he state that Carpenter film was excellent, and THAT was my point.
Is his right?
![]()
...and all this time I thought that it was my point. ;^)
nt
![]()
As Bugs would probably say, "What a maroon!" ;^D
While we may differ preference-wise as to which "Thing" is best, I was not dissing the earlier version. I just feel that Campbell's story actually made it to the screen in Carpenter's version, which is rare for any inspired source material, much less SF. BTW, unless I'm mistaken, even John Carpenter considers The Thing his best film.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: