![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
199.188.1.168
'); } // End --> |
In Reply to: Scorscese: what a small percentage of good posted by tinear on May 29, 2005 at 15:43:33:
Any thoughts on that? I don't see it discussed anywhere in the thread.I remember reading the review in the San Fran rag when I was out there on bidness. * was all it got. Thought I, no way it can be that bad. And it wasn't. A very strangely edited film, a very individualistic directing style that I don't remember ever seeing again (not necessarily a bad thing). Performances WAYYY over the top, but strangely effective. I'd give it the old **1/2 stars cop out. 1st half definitely better than the 2nd and Juliette Lewis very convincing, such promise.....
![]()
Follow Ups:
of why Scorscese ain't a great director.
The performances indeed are over the top, so as to make the characters caricatures.
The original is art, this is artifice.
![]()
and agree on artifice.however, for some strange reason, I like watching the remake. Doesn't mean I like it as art, but I like WATCHING it. Rather that than say, House of Sand And Fog, an altogether good movie but not a terribly WATCHABLE movie.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: