 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: 16:9 to 4:3 or 16:9 to 4:3 posted by Joe Murphy Jr on September 13, 2002 at 17:20:23:
for a given 16:9 picture size, if available, as compared to buying that picture size in a 16:9 display. Still like that in the U.S.?
Follow Ups:
16:9 is the future and 4:3 is the past. As far as the present goes, most are in limbo. My suggestion: all display manufacturers cease production of 4:3 displays. To those that object -- either get on board or get left behind.
I like 16:9, but since I only watch DVD's... Actually, I have no idea what's going on in the TV world, where most people (not necessarily those here) are stuck. I get the impression that most TV is still transmitted 4:3, and people with a 16:9 format display get really annoyed with it, or use some pathetic "zoom" to fill the screen and get even more annoyed.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
