![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
12.44.28.98
'); } // End --> |
I have a Harman Kardon AVR7300. I love everything about it except the cooling fan. I can hear the fan during quiet music passages. So, I've found a buyer for the HK and will need a replacement. Marantz has been suggested and I have looked at NAD both in the 1000 to 1500 price range. Can anyone here confirm either of these choices (or maybe suggest something else?).
Thanks,
Ken
![]()
Follow Ups:
previously i ran my oc9 output into the amplifier's mm section. the level is very soft, but the magic is still there, despite it being a digital amplifier. now i'm running the oc9 into pass lab ono, then into the amp's multi-ch input (most direct signal path to the power-amp section). took a few days to flesh out the harmonics and overtones. it was really enjoyable yesterday afternoon. played the mavericks, chris issak, amanda mcbroom, roy orbison... smokin'
![]()
For any anaolg input. Bypasses all the Digital stuff and goes directly to the Pre-amp section. I alos use a OC9ML/II and run it through my Luxman C-02 for MC step up duties then go tape out to the Sherwoods Aux input.
![]()
check the link below to this product. the multi-channel input is the cleanest, and shortest path to its power-amp section, no eq, and no bass redirection.the mm section on board is not too shabby either, compared to external phonostage like the pass lab ono.
![]()
I heard a 59txi not too long ago driving Sonus Faber Grand Pianos... sounded pretty damn good, actually. I also think that Pioneer's internal D/A must be pretty good. A Denon 2900 was driving it's digital input, and it SMOKED the Denon's analog outputs in direct comparison, IMO. You might be pleasantly surprised!Cheers
Mine is anyway, My DAc in my Sherwood Newcastle Pre-amp certainly sounds better.
![]()
I have a multichannel pre-amp P-965 from them. The DAC sounds great. It comes with a phono MM input, If there receivers are anything like their pre-amp you wont go wrong for the price. Cant comment on the Phono input stage as I use a MC pre-amp from my Luxman C-02 wired in to the Aux input of the sherwood.http://www.sherwoodusa.com/index.html
![]()
If your receiver is doing double duty for music and movies, and the music is important to you, you can do no better than Arcam (without going to expensive separates, of course.)Their latest receiver, the Arcam AVR300, is a killer, with one of the best pre/pro sections I've heard, certainly the best in a HT receiver - you'd have to spend a LOT more to better it. (BTW, I come from the high end 2 channel world).
The AVR300 will set you back around $1800 street price. However, it may last you a looooooong time, so consider it an investment. When and if you get really power hungry speakers, you can always add a more powerful outboard amp and keep the terrific AVR300 for your pre/pro.
If you don't have a large room and large speakers, the Arcam AVR200 might serve.
I've had several HT receivers (Marantz, Denon, and I've heard the NADs) and would take the AVR300 over any of them. Second choice would probably be Rotel.
![]()
...7400 and it sounds wonderful, but then that's in comparison to what it replaced - an entry-level Sony. The next model up, 8400 (now 8500 if you want the auto-leveling feature) supposedly sounds slightly better due to toroidal power transformer.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: