 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
99.62.230.174
In Reply to: RE: Oscars: best thing? Anne Hathaway. I could posted by tinear on February 28, 2011 at 09:42:23
...everything was so predictable, there was nothing surprising or outlandish, the hosts were terrible and not very funny.
Even the gowns were pretty conservative.
Booorrrriiinngg.
When a disabled Kirk Douglas steals the show, you know you have big problems.
Someone suggested James Franco was doing performance art and that he really isn't that bad.
LOL!
Follow Ups:
most of what he was saying.
I was embarrassed for him.
What next? Wheel him in when he's completely disabled?
One thing this evening proved: Hollywood needs someone with class to come along, and soon. Grant, Newman, Steward, Pacino---- hell, ANYONE! First year I can remember Jack wasn't shown, too.... I hope the old fart's okay (must have been a Lakers home game or sumpin?).
Hollywood, I mean. It's been a dead corpse for many years.
Yes, the Academy Awards had an off year. While it went smoothly it was generally a boring affair. Poor choices for hosting combined with a fairly lackluster group of contenders is responsible.
What's needed is a charismatic host like Billy Crystal to step back in for a year or two and a better slate of films competing in all categories. This year is already looking up, but if you and patrick are determined to flaunt your Grey Poupon creds at every opportunity then nothing in the Oscar competitions will blow your skirts up.
AuPh
Post a Followup:
| FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
