Films/DVD Asylum

My post simply stated Putin laid a wreath. You said he was 10 at the time

136.37.101.134

tinear

A

In Reply to: RE: My question was about your OP, so let's start with your OP posted by Chris from Lafayette on May 31, 2021 at 13:01:10

the incident occurred.

I don't see what that has to do with my post.

Putin was long time KGB. KGB was implicated in the massacre, i.e. the snipers in the film were KGB. I think it's interesting that he'd lay a wreath, a gesture of mourning, at the site. Was he pretending the KGB wasn't responsible?

Now, what did you mean by your mentioning his age?

Follow Ups:

You said more than that - Chris from Lafayette 01:23:28 06/01/21 (4)
This is what you said:

"Putin laid a wreath at the site commemorating the massacre a few years ago--- yet he was a member of the organization responsible."

It's obvious that you were attempting to make a connection between the incident in the movie and Putin. I mentioned Putin's age at the time of the incident to indicate that Putin himself had NO connection with that incident. And your question in this last post (Was he pretending the KGB wasn't responsible?) finally reveals what you were really trying to imply: that Putin was "pretending that the KGB was not responsible", which is nothing more than pure, useless speculation on your part.
- Your quarrel is with Konahalovsky, He prominently mentioned the wreath-laying. - tinear 05:35:29 06/01/21 (3)
  I'll defer to his motives and the pertinency over yours.
  
  Next time, turn the gun around before shooting unless you enjoy self-inflicted wounds.
  - I'll defer to his motives too - not your interpretation of them - Chris from Lafayette 10:43:19 06/01/21 (2)
    Talk about turning the gun around. . .
    - What motives? Konchalovsky included it in the film. You need to ask, "why?" - tinear 15:28:08 06/03/21 (1)
      Most people don't. It's rather obvious.
      - YOU were the one who brought up motives - read your own posts - Chris from Lafayette 00:30:11 06/04/21 (0)
        
        In Reply to: RE: What motives? Konchalovsky included it in the film. You need to ask, "why?" posted by tinear on June 03, 2021 at 15:28:08
        
        You think you're the only one who asks "why?" - You flatter yourself.

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Western Glow Tube Service