 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
107.207.107.77
In Reply to: RE: 'Poor Things': WTF? posted by Billy Wonka on January 28, 2024 at 17:16:11
Is that the only thing you have to say about this truly unique film? That Emma Stone appears naked?
Follow Ups:
Not really so unique - see my post to TWB above.
It is big budget though.
Trying to hide from entropy
John K
. . . most critical aspect of any film he posts about. I haven't seen "Poor Things" myself, but I suspect he's right in this case too! ;-)
I saw it. It was a fascinating, creative, unique movie.
I don't fall for the gimmickary of visual overload.
I dozed off a couple of times.
to see what all the hoopala was about... It took me 3 or 4 attempts to get through it, I kept falling asleep. I still stand by what I said about it from the get go. I will add that some of the technical aspects of the film are interesting. Having said that, it reminded me of what a friend mine used to say... "It was weird, for the sake of being weird". THAT I believe is true! Also, I am NOT a fan of the "fish eye" filming technique... I find it distracting and does not further the narrative of the film. Emma Stone WAS the stand-out, but I really was not invested in her character and could have cared less what would happen to her....
| FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
