![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
66.137.224.92
I've read a few of the jerky-cam criticisms and grumbles about how it takes nearly 30 minutes before the real action gets underway, but the hand-held camera is neither distracting nor gimmicky and I'm of the opinion that setting the stage is very important for this technique to work properly, which it does, like a juggernaut! The long and short of it is that this film rocks BIG TIME, ...and more than just the cameras!While some savvy film-goers will no doubt make allusions to The Blair Witch Project, and indeed that experiment in low-budget film-making may have been a contributory precursor of Cloverfield in both style (hand held camera from start to finish) and plot concept (capturing a catastrophic event on film as a fated accident), that is where the similarities end. While Blair Witch Project leaves the distinct impression of being a college film project gone awry, Cloverfield yields no ground in respect to the richness of it's production values and takes no prisoners it's effort to convey realism on a massive scale.
After an ominous opening that makes no bones about foreshadowing some tragic event there is a relaxed build up. The audience is drawn into the somewhat predictable lifestyle of a group of upscale twenty-somethings committing one social faux-pas after another, all caught on videotape as a going away gift for one of the friends making a career move to Tokyo; then there's a paradigm shift in the action. As unexpectedly as real events can often overtake life, the audience is dropped into the confusion of an earth shattering event without the typical manipulative gimmicks and "gotcha" elements so often associated with the genre, and every moment is caught on the party videotape.
In spite of the amateur camera technique and storm chaser realism, every minute of Cloverfield has the feel of a large scale production. In fact, for the sake of absolute realism some scenes of collapsing buildings can't help but evoke uncomfortable memories of the events that unfolded in NYC on 9/11/2001. That said, this is CGI as it should be used, to enhance realism, not overwhelm it.
It would seem that the filmmakers (Director Matt Reeves and Screenwriter Drew Goddard) studied the tension building elements of BWP and re-imagined the concept as a BIG Budget monster movie, only moving forward when they had an exceptional script, highly competent cast, substantial CGI budget and top notch effects team (Phil Tippett Studios) on board. In other words, they brought together all the ingredients to produce a cutting edge, Americanized 'Godzilla' movie that focused on the impact unexpected catastrophic events have on people, and then didn't blow the opportunity!
Those folks concerned that the ominous beasty of undisclosed origin was deprived of adequate visualization by the jerkiness of the hand-held camera can rest assured that this film does NOT cop-out. While the formidable threats are unveiled gradually there is a genuine sense that the audience is a participant in the action, observations shared in real time. Furthermore, grounding the events in first-hand realism provides the kind of edge of seat reaction that films of this type rarely achieve and almost never sustain.
As monster flicks go, Cloverfield may or may not rewrite the genre in toto, but with bold, uncompromising style and an obvious respect for the audience's intelligence this film has endowed the creature feature with legitimacy via an air of believability and sophistication that's oft targeted, but very rarely hits the mark. Kudos to all involved!
Subjectively, I would rate this film four 1/2 stars [****1/2 of *****] on a reptilian scale of five with the caveat that it might not be a bad idea to sit a few rows further back than one usually does if you happen to be a sufferer of shaky-cameritis.
One final thought: For the sequel (...and yes, looking at Cloverfield's first place $40 million off-weekend opening that should probably be a given) it might be a good idea that the filmmakers consider an entirely different approach (...sans shaky hand-held camera and amateur documented feel) to explore themes outside of the focus of this film (...those enigmatic topics that left some in the audience with nagging questions about the beast's origin and the eventual outcome of the tragic events). Origins and closure was not what this film was about nor should it have been, but if a strong sequel is to follow the expectation will be one of resolving loose threads without repetitious elements.
Ciao for now,
AuPh
Edits: 01/23/08 01/24/08 01/24/08 01/24/08Follow Ups:
There's a muscle on her arm
With a red and blue tatoo
That says
Fort Worth I love you
It might be better in an HT venue on a smaller screen and the ability to pause to help quell the hurl instinct.
Quite a few plot holes but what do you expect from a Monster movie ? I liked this one better than any of the Godzilla movies.
Cloverfield was great fun. The beginning could have been shorter and the shakey cam less shakey but overall, everything was done very well. They showed just enough so you could tell what was going on but it still seemed 'live' and spontanious. Plus they did not miss an opportunity for excitement or to make you jump.
If you think you might like it you probably will! Worth a look!
Hi, Audiophilander!
I'll give the movie a thumbs up, too.
I was taken by the idea of looking at a Godzilla movie from the point of view of one of the people on the ground, instead of the usual 'omniscient camera' point of view.
I also liked how the action moved forward and the characters 'decided' what to do under these circumstances.
I even liked the almost typical twist toward the end.
The only part that made me lose my "suspension of disbelief" was the fact that there were so few people milling about wherever the characters went. I also had a twinge of plot distrust in that the monster just kept strolling through Manhattan. I was thinking that after 8 hours of screaming and knocking stuff over, he/she/it would get tired of getting shot at and bombed on and take the action somewhere else. (I'm sure there's a plot line for that behavior, but the monster seemed to keep walking down the same streets.)
![]()
The ticket taker actually gave us a nausea warning, but I had no problems.
It was good fun, and the tension ratchets up exponentially-great pacing, and the length seemed just right. I thought that the, er, smaller "visitors" were considerably more frightening than the big Kahuna.
J.J. Abrams is really on a roll-we're big Lost fans, and I can't wait to see what he does with Star Trek this Christmas.
Wow.. Audi and I finally agree on a movie. This review is right on. This movie draws you right in and it is quite a ride. I really enjoyed it.
...it's an intense, entertaining, well-done film that keeps you on the edge of your seat.
I'd give it a B- at best.
Not a "great" film by any means.
covering the uninteresting going away party. The real craft was in the slow revealing of the creature and it's multi-legged little friends..
Complicit Constapo Talibangelical since MMIII
...to introduce and give you a connection to the individual characters.
Then, surprise - the monster came out of nowhere.
Very effective.
.
Complicit Constapo Talibangelical since MMIII
(nt)
;O)
(nt)
nt
Best Regards,
Chris redmond.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: