![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
84.169.254.100
After seeing and loving the " Man for Hire " I bought this one.
A ridiculous, horribly played film, with the exception of Mr. Bendix, who must have read Steinbeck..
Laughable.
Follow Ups:
starring a terrific, young Robert Mitchum; "Gun Crazy," which influenced the genre; "Where the Sidewalk Ends" with the beautiful Gene Tierney and the suprisingly effective Dana Andrews as the brutal cop; "In a Lonely Place" featuring one of Bogie's best performances with a supernova-hot Gloria Grahame.
I think you'd enjoy all of them but a French guy directed the first (Tourneur)...
Gene Tierney is actually one of my momentum love.
Tourneur was a great cineast for " strange films " ala Zombie, I like his ways and feeling...He made most with almost nothing, the essence of terror...
I know most of them, but thank you...
I always liked the Coen Brothers' take on Hammett with Miller's Crossing which seemed to take portions of many Hammett books.
As I did not saw it, I can not comment, sorry.
It's a lot different than "TGFH," no doubt, but IMHO, a good Paramount 1940's era detective drama. I think the later "Blue Dahlia" is superior to both. Try it, if you haven't already. Also, to read the Hamett, is to see what Hollywood did (and does) to fine examples of literature. Paramount made this as a vehicle for its movie stars, and that has it's inherent shortcomings. The director (Stuart Heisler) is a not a genius, but proved over a long career as a dependable craftsman. I find "Key" entertaining, and have seen it many times. I provide a link to Heisler's IMDB to show his versatility, and proof of a long career. He worked with a lot of stars, (including Ladd) on some A, but mostly B pictures.
Regards
Well The Blue D. is no doubt a good film, well played and on built on a solid scrip.
Still for me TMFH, is the better. it may be because Greene was the author and it is near to my own sensibility.
As for the Glass key, it got it all wrong...
I saw this movies, as a kid, and I had them in a good souvenir, now after all this years, it was more of a curiousity, now Man for Hire, was also a great pleasure!
Now between BD and MfH it is a taste matter.
And 1942 was maybe a better vintage than 1946....
Well I am in the middle of it. I mean the BD.
Well at last a different pair of shoes, well played and not ridiculous.
Now I watch the other part...
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: