![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
71.34.247.27
and not much more.
Took way too long to get going, maybe 1/2 hour. When it did, it held one's attention but the ending was way too predictable.
I read that Phil Knight's kid, Travis, was the head illustrator but I couldn't find his or his Dad's name in the credits. Surely, Phil would have invested in the film as a producer????
Follow Ups:
I went on opening weekend, and there were many people lugging their toddlers and infants along. I think anything "animated" people consider family friendly, and I do not think this qualifies as a standard kid's film. Maybe it is a kid's film in the context that Roald Dahl writes kid's books, but I think there is a lot of non-traditional storytelling and dark images/humour that a lot of parents may not be comfortable with (the implanted and thonged sister on the trapeze as an overt example :-).
I actually liked the character build up. There was so much eye candy it was enough for me to lay back and enjoy (I got a vicarious thrill from the delivery van backing up at the opening so maybe I am easily thrilled :-). I was also very surprised by Teri Hatcher and how good her voice was, not something I have really noticed from her before.
have changed a lot over the past decade or so. Kids are used to seeing lots of weird stuff on TV and films like "Alien" are watched by 7 and 8 year olds.
I liked the film but I thought it wasn't a classic.
Coraline has a VERY dark storyline with lots of troubling nightmarish images and concepts that aren't presented in an overtly musical comedy format (like Nightmare Before Christmas or even The Corpse Bride). It's an excellent film, but it isn't a 'kids' movie per se.
AuPh
I hear what you are saying. I have a neighbour that will let her kids watch the Saw movies at ages eight and ten (I also showed her that her twelve year old was watching hardcore porn around the clock, she did not seem too concerned about that either). I do not consider any of those kids movies either, and think maybe part of it is there is a big difference between being able to sit in front of it and being able to understand and appreciate it. In the case of Coraline, I think so much is simple appreciation of something so beautiful that I think it is lost on a lot of children used to rapid action and straight ahead CGI'ed magnificence (most of which leaves me cold).
I am not sure if it will be a classic either (I do think Nightmare Before XMAS is). I do think films like this are pretty rare though, and I am very glad I went and saw it in the theater in 3d.
It was definitely a dark movie. Not good for a kid in, say, early grade school. But enjoyable non the less.
We'll have to agree to disagree about global warming until the next global cooling scare comes along
things extended out over the audience. some of them were right in front of my face, but just out of reach. my last 3-d movie was a Russ Meyers semi-porn, maybe 30 years ago. I think that the 3-d process will grow significantly in the future, maybe mainstream at some point to compete with home theater.
effects.
Most people had gone by then and missed them.
that "ribbon" thing that floated out was unreal
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: