![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
93.194.206.184
All to serve one goal.
A fulminant 10 minutes end.
So Clint you like to play cat and mouse.
But what an end.
PS: The tune at the opening is the choice of a great music lover.
Follow Ups:
I wasn't that thrilled with the film, it's certainly NOT his best effort, especially considering some of
the fine films he has made in the past 15 years. I did like the co-stars, though it was a bummer there
was quite a bit of stereotyping, including Wally himself. If I had to grade it I'd give it a C+.
Saw a friend that loves Gran Torino the day after I'd seen it and his favorite aspect was that Eastwood reprised
almost every film character he's ever portrayed. So, in a sense it was Eastwood's tribute to himself.
I kind of like that aspect of the film and can appreciate the humor inherent in it.
And, let's face it, if you like CE, you'll like Gran Torino.
“ The man that hath no music in himself, Nor is not moved with concord of sweet sounds, Is fit for treasons, stratagems, and spoils; The motions of his spirit are dull as the night... Let no such man be trusted. Mark the music ” - William Shakespeare
were serious, wide-spread, typically American ones--- and overcoming them with courage and, ultimately, self-realization.
It was well-done enough so that the central character wasn't a stereotype but a real creation. That, I'd argue, was the result of superior writing, acting, and direction.
It isn't easy to tackle the toughest issue in American history but he did a damn fine job. Only Eastwood could have done it, having developed the screen persona he has. In that respect, it was similar to the fine, "Unforgiven."
You have to wonder if Wally's, oops, Mr. Kowalski's self-realization would have developed without his physical health problems
to... spur... him on. I thought that aspect of the story kinda weak.
Then again, it was written for him to find his courage in that situation. I haven't known anyone even vaguely like his character, and
am only familiar with that type of person from literature or films, so thought him a stereotype, until the last ten minutes when he veered from tradition.
I will watch this film again after a time and have a feeling I may appreciate it more. I do like Eastwood and think he's a damn talented filmaker, just off his mark with this one, scriptwise.
“ The man that hath no music in himself, Nor is not moved with concord of sweet sounds, Is fit for treasons, stratagems, and spoils; The motions of his spirit are dull as the night... Let no such man be trusted. Mark the music ” - William Shakespeare
... could have done it, but he is uniquely positioned to portray that character.
He has become a fine auteur covering variously white/male/ageing issues.
![]()
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: