![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
72.34.70.10
One obvious name comes to mind, M. Night Shyamalan. What is so great about Hitchcock is how each scene he treats with care and makes it art. I sense Shyamalan attempts to do this too, to varying degrees of success.
Any other directors out there that go the extra mile?
We'll have to agree to disagree about global warming until the next global cooling scare comes along
Follow Ups:
...strikes me more of a Serling wannabe.
copies some of the techniques.
NO!
There is no way, as less as Palma to make him a dignified new Hitch.
David Lean went the extra mile. Milos Foreman comes to mind. Terry Gillum tries hard. Hitchcock was trained as an engineer. So was Eisenstein. It's interesting that both of these guys drew the scene (framed it in story board) on paper THEMSELVES and had a firm idea of just exactly what they wanted, where the camera should be and it was always there for a reason. Hitchcock seldom ever used any other lens except a 50mm or 2 inch because it offers the same magnification as the human eye. He also many times shot in continuity leaving little doubt to the editor what was gong to come next. The reel of trims on REAR WINDOW was rumored to be very small. GRH
"I think the journey should be just as enjoyable as the destination." GRH
Hitchcock is hard to beat. He produced so many great films consistently. Far more 'hits' than 'misses', very unusual for any director. Scorcese may come close. There may be many wannabes. Hitchcock was amazing.
__
Probability is probably the key to life.
No and no.
No comparison to Sir Alfred.
The last film I saw was the " Aviator " what a weak weak show.
You can tell it was made by a master. And I'd rather watch an interesting failure than a successful mediocrity. There's quite a bit I love about The Aviator, and I don't actually think it's a failure in any sense, just not up to Scorsese's very best.
I will have to disagree with you - perhaps Scorsese doesn't translate well for you? But he is "the real deal".
But to my mind he is one of the great living filmmakers:
Mean Streets
Taxi Driver
The Last Waltz
Raging Bull
Goodfellas
Five absolute film masterpieces, plus a list of interesting, if not perfect, films:
Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore
After Hours
New York, New York
Casino
Bringing Out The Dead
Kundun
The Aviator
Many will disagree about Bringin Out The Dead, Aviator and Kundun...I don't care :-)
No Direction Home
Last Waltz
The Departed
Gangs of New York
and the amazing King of Comedy
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." -HST
Masterpiece?
Ok I think that he is a master in cinema knowledge, that is his really master being.
Now I saw Aviator only once and I would not pretend that I ever had the wish to see it twice.
But I will comply to my duty because if you, whose mind about films I care of, and will take a second as open mind look I can.
Now maybe he do not translate well to me, I am afraid, I do not feel an affinity to his work.
I love his films on film.
Now maybe we just donīt fit together.
In due time I will post again on the Aviator.
Now it would be boring if we did not disagree from time to time. When I think that Victor donīt appreciate Hitchcock...
Raging Bull and The Last Temptation.
And Dylan documentary.
And super doc on Italian film history.
C'mon, one needn't knock a great director to build up another.
I'd say Scorsese is El Greco and Hitch is Rubens.
Ok for the Dylan, but the rest is not enough for El Greco who he, was a GENIUS:
(nt)
nt
Which was smart, since it was so blatantly apparent. But his honesty puts him in the 'homage', not the 'ripoff' category. And, he turned out some decent films.
![]()
"dammit"
nt
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: