![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
71.203.125.32
In Reply to: RE: Is "Dr. Strangelove" Kubrick's masterpiece?? posted by Mike K on August 22, 2009 at 13:50:44
One of them is sense of proportion and knowing where to stop. Kubrick lost there on these counts. The out of control arm scene is so ridiculously primitive, it is capable of single handedly destroying any claim at greatness. Masters just don't make such mistakes. Throughout his career Kubrick remained the master of scenes, but not of films. His early works might be the exception to that rule.
Follow Ups:
...and it works best by exaggerating characters and situations up to a point close to distortion, what makes them even more recognisable...
Or maybe it bites too close to your bone? Your cybermisbehaviour, and the character you portray of yourself, certainly wouldnīt be misplaced if in this film...
Kubrick was a true master, and "Dr. Strangelove" is one of his masterpieces, much better than "Barry Lyndon" indeed. And it will still be alive and fresh as long as there are patrioteer kooks thumbing their hollow chests around...
BF
It suffice for you that your political vision is realized for placing Stangelove and counting it to the first rang of goodness in the film Olympia.
Now I just saw it again after many years, and it has lost the power, partly lost, it once had.
It belong to the Vietnam and the anti war movement, it stick too much in this " Zeitgeist " to be the film you pretend it to be.
Now it is, like Victor said, one with good scenes, as most of SK films are.
A much lesser work than Barry Lindon for sure.
And I donīt know why you attack Victor on personal matter when it goes to a film.
Every one is entitle to his own view.
And mine is that Kubrick is way too much overestimate, and I had for years the highest meaning for his films.
Not anymore, of course he is one of the greatest.
Strangelove is a classic. Half a century old and it still grabs people with it's vitality and it's long dark look into madness.Think as you wish, no ever brings up your favorite Kubrick. I can't even remember the name. He won't be remembered for it, or 2001, or any of the others.
Strangelove has become part of the culture, not just a movie, an iconic shorthand to
describe something inside us that defies easy explanation.
Edits: 08/27/09 08/27/09
That is problem with such works, as opposed to more timeless ones.
Call it a classic or whatever you wish, it will join the ranks of works of art perhaps unjustly forgotten. Some great masterpieces, like 12 Chairs... taken out of their historical context become deflated balloons.
The Paths of Glory, on the other hand, will stay with us, because it transcends the particular piece of history, and speaks a much more universal, HUMAN language.
![]()
.
![]()
.
Wasn't too hard to figure out.
![]()
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: