![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
174.22.6.24
In Reply to: RE: Waterloo Redux posted by mr grits on September 07, 2009 at 16:10:44
And why "Gladheateher" is ridiculous. And pretty much all war films with massed armies for the past twenty years or so. What wrecked a great scene in "Private Ryan" was the obviously false "armada."
Follow Ups:
Hundreds (or thousands) of extras add a weight to a scene no digital anything can touch. Because even if you know nothing about filmmaking, you ultimately know what reality looks like. And you react to it.
"War and Peace" (The Russian original) has this in spades. It is not the greatest film ever made, but the battle scenes have rarely, if ever, been equalled, simply because they used uncountable numbers of Russian soldiers as extras, and the images of them stretched to the horizon, doing battle will never be mistaken for someone cloning people at a computer.
CC.
FX makes every film look ridiculous after five years time past.
I don't think it belongs in the discussion of **serious** war films... he-he...
I love the Waterloo for the atmosphere, thick as old road tar, and general historic accuracy in all its aspects, including the troops, equipment, etc. Wellington sucked, but he was not the center of the film, so his effect on the whole was minimal.
Many have criticized Steiger, but to me he gave us the best Napoleon in cinema - and yes, I generally love that actor.
![]()
When he did overplayed his part as Napoleone?
Too refined?
![]()
I am still at it....
.
NO GRITS NO GLORY
from all that scenery digestion.
100%
.
NO GRITS NO GLORY
dfsa
.
NO GRITS NO GLORY
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: