 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
174.22.2.51
In Reply to: RE: "Young actors"...... posted by afilado on December 17, 2009 at 09:26:06
I base my opinions upon when in their 20s.
"Wright, Ruffulo, Dillahunt, Linney, Hoffman, Keener, Renner, etc. "
None of these are really leading actors, with the exception of Hoffman who plays mostly quirky, zany characters. Linney I think is static. Keener is the real deal but she doesn't seem to get very many roles in very good films.
You're kind of playing a little unfairly here, as well. I mentioned all the most well-known American actors that star in 99% of the films. You pick the character actor types that only get the minor films, the indies which is a far cry from the Danish actors.
Powerful, non-kooky American male leads just don't seem to exist (Dillahunt...... for Christ's sake!)
I look back a generation and I see plenty of strong American lead actors. If you haven't noticed a drastic change to the adolescent, you aren't paying attention.
Follow Ups:
...with exception of Dillahunt have been leads in many films. You know that; why say otherwise. Be honest.Linney is "static".... what does that mean?
Now, tell me the lead actors, in wide distribution, you're referring to, beyond the oldsters, in Brothers.
Acting is acting, whether quirky or otherwise. Dillahunt is smart, articulate, well-trained and serious about his career. How pompous of you to imply otherwise. Again, maybe you just don't know better.
In the case of Kaas, how much of a stretch is it for an "angry" young man to play ............... an angry young man?
If the Danes are so exceptionally talented why aren't they active in a more worldly sense. The best in the world, regardless of nationality want to come NY or Hollywood. Where are the Danes? How many Danes have parts, much less leads, outside Denmark? Name them.
Big fish; little pond.
Edits: 12/17/09
..I'm still focused on your original statement. You're continuing to move the goal posts it seems to me, continuing to expand and qualify the the standards for discussion. Not worth trying to keep up.May as well talk about them Ducks or Gophers. Something manly or boxerly.
What a meaningless line of argument that the Danes were younger then.........so were the Americans. Compare bodies of work anywhere in time of the six you mentioned v. the half dozen or so I mentioned in my 30 second list. Including Dillahunt. Do it or yield.
Next you'll be talking relative percentages of total national population from which the groups came.
Like I've said in the past, it sometimes seems the case that you claim a film or actor becomes better simply by virtue of your attention.
You're mostly wise and insightful about cinema; in this case you're full of yourself and way off the mark.
PPffftttt! LOL.
Edits: 12/17/09
teen actors, can one?
So, a discussion of "young" actors would center on work in the twenties, early thirties. I merely pointed out that the Danes did lots of good stuff in their twenties.
As for moving goal posts, you're being really unfair. You misread my original post which was "YOUNG ACTORS." For the sake of discussion, I soldiered on. You completely ignore my points about leading vs. quirky character actors, which is central. You want to compare Dellahunt or Kenner to.... Kaas or Thomsen? Get serious, really. Look at the résumés. Third-billing vs. top billing.
And my larger point is the juvenalization of American films. It is geared to teenagers and the lead actors that have come up during this time all look.... teen-agey. Cutesie. Downey's grin. Pitt's wide-as-a-canyon smile and dimples.
No cutesie in Denmark (or Iran, French, Italian, Korean, et al) films.
You like cutesie, don't be bashful.
I don't.
...original points.Cutsie? I have no idea what you're talking about nor do you with that reference. Nowhere in my remarks here or elsewhere can you find traction for it. And I think you know better. Nasty little foul.
I watch as many films as you do and 95% of them are ex-U.S. I took up defense of Hollywood types simply to point out the excessiveness of your claim: "Where are the talented young actors in this country and why has Denmark become such a treasure trove of superb acting? I don't think we have one actor the match of any of these six."
In a 30 second sweep of my memory I named a number of American contemporaries of equal talent and accomplishment, at least. Then your dancing started.
What is the superb Danish acting treasure trove you refer to? The one that stands apart in comparison to the youngsters from Hollywood. Name them.
And, honestly, do you really want to stand by that last sentence, which, contrary to your continued revisionism, includes several elders.
Watch What Doesn't Kill You, with Ruffalo and a "young" American cast. It mines a very similar emotional territory as Brothers and is every bit the quality of film and performances.
If I thought it would be appreciated I'd name others worthy of inclusion in an earnest discussion of this matter, filling an obvious gap in your knowledge. I prefer, however, to do more than "soldier" on.
Edits: 12/17/09
are you purposefully being recalcitrant?
And you continue to be unfair, afilado my friend. I SPECIFICALLY specified the six actors I mentioned as being unmatched by American actors. You replied by listing a bunch of American supporting actors or leads that have made their living playing quirky/edgy, i.e. Hoffman, Keener.
I continue to smack your softballs over the fence and it is you who then change the subject or construct yet another straw man.
Danish film in the 90s was very fine, indeed. It carried on, somewhat, in the early 2000s but now seems to be in decline, as the Danes themselves now are scrambling to right what many feel is a listing national film association.
American actors are at a great disadvantage. They attend schools where a certain type of acting is taught. There is very little avant garde stage work to destroy the old and usher in a fresher acting style. So, we get mannerisms now legitimized for generations. I can't stand it.
Your need for being right, for winning (hitting "softballs" indeed) makes you less interesting.
I was hoping you'd rise above that faulty misspeak or be more entertaining and creative in recovery. Now you're just repeating yourself, becoming small and competitive in dull displays of scholarship.
You showed me nothing new.
Soldier on elsewhere.
:-)
.
pierced, tat-tagged women but what the hell!
"You're continuing to move the goal posts it seems to me, continuing to expand and qualify the the standards for discussion. "
Nothing against him but that's Tin's M.O. to a T.
"The man is only half himself, the other half is his expression." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Hollywood types because you eat at their trough.
Where I did defend any Hollywood types? I just pointed out that afilado's observation/assessment was right on.
"The man is only half himself, the other half is his expression." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Edits: 12/17/09
bring it up out there.
Kind of like a guy getting heat-butted in a bar and rising up in church to whine.
I don't have an outside issue...I was merely supporting the truth of afilado's observation.
"The man is only half himself, the other half is his expression." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
but you're at the wrong end, it's your head that's in the sand.
Post a Followup:
| FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
