 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
97.125.113.116
In Reply to: RE: I see your quote, and raise you this one... posted by Victor Khomenko on January 22, 2010 at 06:26:55
dfs
Follow Ups:
.
not exactly the kind of paranoia which would serve us well in the WH.
He also acted like a racist while claiming not to be one.
"Reagan opposed certain civil rights legislation, although he later reversed his opposition to voting rights and fair housing laws. He strongly denied having racist motives.[52] When legislation that would become Medicare was introduced in 1961, Reagan created a recording for the American Medical Association warning that such legislation would mean the end of freedom in America. "
All in all, your hero did more damage to his country than Putin has done to his-- he was, in other words, both the actor and the president and did double the damage.
...you have my permission not to watch Ronnie's movies!Or Putin's... for that matter!
Edits: 01/22/10
d
Today, looking back, I can see the spots.
If you want to see a REALLY great Russian film, try to get a copy of Heart of a Dog. It may be hard to relate in places, and much of it will go over any foreigner's head, but as far as movie making goes, that one is simply superb, with absolutely record-setting acting by Yevstigneev.
Next to works like that Mikhalkov's opuses look like teacher's pet's lame homework.
d
.
mention and the commentary. Truly, the older Doc and Sharikov are very, very good actors, quite unmatched in gravitas by this generation of "ironic" American actors.
Bulgy isn't my cup of tea, The Master and Margarita I read but found too fantastic, too outlandish. That said, the first--- I'd guess--- twenty or thirty pages with that railway accident I found incredibly good. The conceits of Bulgy are too strong, too crazy to contain my interest for very long. It's not him, per se: I can't make it through the Central and S. American similar authors such as Cortazar and Marquez.
I couldn't tell the exact sequence nor link them so my viewing experience wasn't totally pleasurable, nor is my computer screen very large (20" Apple). Still, I saw enough and clearly want to find a dvd to watch in entirety and in proper sequence.
At this moment it occurred to me that perhaps if I think of Bulgy as a a mix of Monty Python and Bunuel I'll appreciate it more. Yes, that may be the key.
I started watching and couldn't stop...
By a coincidence, we were discussing Bulgakov's life the other day... I expressed my surprise that after writing this work in 1925 he managed to die not from a bullet but illness in 1940. People had been destroyed for much, much less.
The subs do not accurately convey the Bulgakov's acidic sense of humor, and there are obvious errors in spots, but overall it is there, and I am very glad it is available.
Dying to hear your reaction... that movie is extremely dear to me.
pretty amazed that this book and movie could have been openly produced at any time in the soviet era. I'm equally puzzled that the film isn't better known. Apparently the book was "banned" from publishing for 60 years. As you say, one is compelled to wonder how in the world did Bulgakov escape a quiet state bullet in the head?
The political overtones of it are blatant.
Brilliant, surgical, for-the-masses insight into the simmering chaos and inevitable breakdown of revolutionary man's creations - technological, social or otherwise, absent humility. Whether on a personal or committee level.
There were times when I stopped action or turned the sound off to gauge my impression. The strength and character of the story is still there in the sheer images. What vividly-drawn characters, including the weather, the spare street life, the rickety contraptions, the imposing little desperation in everything.
I may read the book but my intuition is that the film is a successful adaptation and carries Bulgakov's weight very well. I'm still mulling the film and want to watch again. In seeing it for the first time last night I thought of Chaplin, Renoir, the Marx brothers, Carroll, Bunuel......
For me it is top rank movie making. Everybody who loves film needs to know about it.
I am glad you liked it... like I said, I consider it a very special movie.It seems like you have been able to grasp the essence of it, and yes, the movie does great justice to the wonderful book.
I wonder, however, with the subtitles between you and the Bulgakov's prose, how much falls the prey to untranslatable cultural undertones. Bulgakov's language is thick, every word is important, one misses one word in a long sentence and it loses its sharp focus.
A case in point - one of the most poignant parts to professor's monologues was the subject of Disruption... or "Razrukha" in Russian. One will not be able to fully feel the depth of the cuttingly sarcastic remarks without knowing the role that word has played in Soviet propaganda, its importance in the endless rhetoric. "Razrukha" was the all-encompassing excuse for all the bad things that the Revolution brought to the country... of course the bolsheviks "inherited" it, it was "forced" on them, imported and installed by the international aggressors. The professor goes to the heart of the problem, and his analysis is one of the many bright sparkles that populate Bulgakov's work.
The directing, the cinematography, the acting are all outstanding - including the discovery of Vladimir Tolokonnikov - Sharikov, totally unknown to that point.
If you liked this one, you might want to find his other works - particularly his Master and Margarita, and Idiot.
Edits: 01/23/10
Post a Followup:
| FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
