![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
24.192.111.143
In Reply to: RE: "What was it about anyway?" posted by J.R. on March 17, 2010 at 10:19:53
-
Follow Ups:
If I'd insulted you, kid, you'd be in intensive care somewhere. Look
above you; Victor's insulting Auph without provocation. It's what he
does. By the way, did you know that J.R.R. Tolkien held the Rawlinsonian
Chair of Anglo-Saxon at Oxford for twenty years? He was a world famous
philologist and a close friend of C.S. Lewis, but I bet you don't like
or understand the Narnia films either. Go bite some tires or suck some
trailer hitches. Yours,
J.R.
I've even re-traced many of the rooms and buildings that Tolkien inhabited at Oxford.
I just don't think the films (especially the mind-numbing computer-effects) did justice to his books.
But then, most film adaptations of great literature fall short, don't they?
I wrote my Master's thesis on Tolkien many years ago; it was entitled
"An Annotated Glossary of the Proper Names in the Mythopoeic Fiction of
J.R. Tolkien." I thought Jackson did a pretty fair job with an
extremely difficult task and I thought most of the CG stuff was adequate
especially in the opening battle scenes where the One Ring is taken from
Sauron. With the advances in CG, as evidenced in "Avatar", I would think
that a remaking of LotR would be astonishing. Anyway, I thought Jackson
did rather well the primitive technology at hand. But, hey, I'm hardly
an objective observer. I really wanted to like the films, and I did, but
I've been told I'm a cheap date. Regards,
J.R.
Be happy, health care reform is on the way. That means you can afford stronger meds and shock therapy!
NT
fs
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: