![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
62.227.237.203
In Reply to: RE: Firth probably should have gotten an Oscar for his performance . . . posted by mr grits on February 23, 2011 at 14:28:07
Homosexuals keep popping up every where.
Do you have an eye for?
A true political film. Made from an obsession. Pretentious. Empty and when I think of the good critics about, I feel half of them to be pederast.
In the same league than Pasolini as the lust for male body but without any intelligence nor intellectuality.
First was more than good. the set was lavish good old Tom is a top cloths maker.
Follow Ups:
dfs
My dear it was humour with a prise of truth. Actually more than a prise.
If you have seen the film, you know of what I talk of.
It is an homosexual film for homosexual.
To put it shortly.
BTW, the architecture in the home is one of the few great American art forms that trumps European: mid-century modern architecture, especially for homes.
We went to see it because it was... ahem... a foreign movie. As we entered the theater I knew there was something different about it...
![]()
Would be that way I would complain just the same.
Willing to look in the mirror and ask yourself a few questions? Do you ask of all heterosexual films that they include a gay character? The film bothered you because of its content. I found it lacking because of its quality.
Big difference.
I ask for nothing. I just donīt like films whose contend are like that one. beside the part ( good part ) of Firthīs lost love, by accident and the flash back, who was nicely put into place.
I donīt like all this male encounters ( or women in a hetero film ), this is an obsessive picture handling.
Now if you donīt get it...
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: