![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
64.134.148.49
I decided to do it on separate thread instead of contributing it to others since I may agree with Tinear but for different reason.
First of all, I don't recommend the movie as of this moment. Now it may change since I thought of '2001' the same say I think of this movie.
Needless to say, I 'grew' up and now appreciate '2001', especially on a big screen.
I think people should look at this 'movie' as a visual and psycho-acoustic 'poetry' if they want to appreciate it. I am just unable to bring myself to that point of view as of this moment.
To me, parts of this 'movie' looks and sounds like a very slick MTV video or commercial designed to sell underwares.
For me, as of this moment, an interesting failure that may grow on me, maybe someday.
Follow Ups:
My danish wife, who could not relate to Winter's Bone, could also not relate to a family in which there was so much violence and regret was the only substitute for imprisonment. She refuses to believe that Ozark hill-billy culture can exist or that parents who beat their kids are not reported to the local government authorities. Her idea of a good movie is one where ordinary people deal with tragedy through quiet suffering, acted out in conversations among family and friends.
This was to me a movie about brutality with a trite, happy ending. I far preferred the ending of Dogville where those who brutalized the weak were held accountable for their actions by the machine-gun toting angels.
So did my wife.
"What did the Romans ever do for us?"
.......didn't care much for this movie. Too 'cerebral' perhaps?
"My danish wife, who could not relate to Winter's Bone, could also not relate to a family in which there was so much violence and regret was the only substitute for imprisonment."
I think you and your wife are being 'American' when subscribing such a Manichean view.
delivered with a lighter hand. The constant sophomoric "why are we here" drivel, recited in breathless voice-over, was too much. It would be hard to satirize the film, it's already so over the top.
"The constant sophomoric "why are we here" drivel, recited in breathless voice-over, was too much." - Tinear
Yes, I understand where you're coming from. That's why I had said earlier, this 'movie' needs to be appreciated as a non-linear 'poetry', not a 'novel' with standard linear chronology.
But that is just too much 'avant-garde' for me as of this moment, or as you might say, too 'sophomoric'.
It would be hard to satirize the film, it's already so over the top.
At a very young age, people question why they are here, what its all about. The central ideas of the film not only are clichés, they are repeated for effect for HOURS. And they are breathlessly mouthed in the most simplistic imaginable dialogue. The universe is a cold place and we are emotive, emotional beings. People die and there doesn't seem to be any reason.
Now, I don't mean to imply people don't think about these things as they mature; but most people have found answers at a young age--- after a tragedy, it is what allows them to continue on.
Malick's unforgivable gaffe is that he had to beat us over the head, BOTH visually and aurally, with this thought. A good filmmaker would let events speak for themselves. In "2001," and I hesitate to compare a Sistine Chapel panel to a graffiti wall, a great filmmaker shows how to address somewhat the same questions--- and many more--- in a clever, non-obvious, and original manner. Malick hasn't made a good film since his first one, "Badlands." He never reaches for anything but the 9-pound hammer.
....this movie should be appreciated as a 'poetry'.
"Malick's unforgivable gaffe is that he had to beat us over the head, BOTH visually and aurally, with this thought."
....kind like a poetry.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: