Films/DVD Asylum

Whatever

99.250.101.209

barryb

A

In Reply to: RE: "They" didn't say "Bain" too often, "they" said "Bane" too often... posted by Steve O on July 23, 2012 at 13:21:55

It sounds the same to a movie going audience. Given that the movie was not subtitled, it played the same as if there were a different spelling.
The powers that be will assure Obama is in for another term of destruction. They will steal the election, if necessary. With media control, there will probably be no need for that. Ron Paul was successfully neutralized by the media early in the primaries. (Of course this was followed up by voter machine fraud).

Edits: 07/24/12

Follow Ups:

This Just In! Batman determines Election Winner! Mind Control Blamed.. - oldmkvi 08:44:58 07/24/12 (0)
Tell us again about your Listening Ritual, to remind us just how nuts you really are!
You, and a few others here are really out there, man. How do you get through the day?
So much fear and anger. It's amazing to me.
RE: There's discernment for you ... - Jeff Starrs 04:32:17 07/24/12 (4)
'It sounds the same.'

You must be an incredibly rigorous analysist of conspiracy theories, too.
- Misses the point - barryb 05:38:26 07/24/12 (3)
  It sounds the same to an unknowing public. Given that most people do not see the movie subtitled, there is no way to know how the name was spelled. Saying 'whatever' means that the distinction is meaningless.
  
  Regarding conspiracies, the words "conspiracy" and "theory" or "theorist" should not be used together or in the same sentence, unless one's goal is to demonstrate their ignorance. Conspiracies are reality. There are occasionally ridiculous conspiracy theories (like the official account of 9/11). The term 'conspiracy theorist' was coined by the CIA in 1968 in an attempt to discredit those who questioned the absurd Warren Commision Report.
  
  It's time for people to wake up and not stay sleeping in their clueless cocoon. It's time to suspend the guard of vile emotional programming to which they have been subjected.
  - RE:Not at all ... - Jeff Starrs 06:54:59 07/24/12 (2)
    ... you project yourself as a discerning conspiracy analyst.
    You're not discerning at all.
    You're ready to gobble up anything without the slightest discriminating mind.
    You're remarks in the above post ('it sounds the same') are evidence of your glaring laxism and gullability.
    - RE:Not at all ... - barryb 07:39:18 07/24/12 (1)
      I'm not the one gullible enough to go along with the official story of 9/11 or the lone gunman theory of JFK, now am I?
      
      The media influence has made my sensible ideas seem idiotic and vile. Hopefully, you'll be able to overcome your unfortunate programming.
      - sensible ideas? - oldmkvi 08:50:48 07/24/12 (0)
        
        In Reply to: RE:Not at all ... posted by barryb on July 24, 2012 at 07:39:18
        
        Good Luck.

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Signature Sound

[ Signature Sound Lounge ]