![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
192.35.35.35
In Reply to: RE: Title choice not significant????? posted by Jack G on December 11, 2007 at 07:00:48
E.g. I waited for the Extended (DTS) versions of LOTR before I bought them on DVD. For the long-term, bandwidth and storage are very important considerations, that consideration is driving my selections for now.
Follow Ups:
What good is a format, if you don't like what its offering? That's why I jumped off the SACD bandwagon 6 months after I jumped on it.
Oh sure, its nice to hear promises of how glorious things will be in the future, but what good is that if they don't have any movies you want to see?
Jack
There is only one reason to buy into HD: a fascination with QUALITY and a desire to see a tremendous volume of films released with that QUALITY.
-------------"I have found that if you love life, life will love you back." -Arthur Rubinstein (1887-1982)
But I have over 80 HD DVDs, and only 20 BDs-5 of which were free, and the Ocean's Trilogy I got on BD because the HD DVD was sold out.
OTOH, I have over 1000 DVDs. Most of my watching is still SD.
> > > There is only one reason to buy into HD: a fascination with QUALITY < < <
I'm not going to buy a nice picture of a movie that I don't like. If you want to do that, by all means go for it. I won't-that sends the wrong message to the studios: "I'll buy anything in HD!".
I'm sure Sony loves you.
Jack
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: