![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
98.193.213.200
In Reply to: RE: Give it up - you can't win this one posted by Ole Lund Christensen on January 05, 2008 at 04:03:40
>>So I won the other ones:_)<<
If you thinking you've "won the other ones" will make you less annoying, then sure - you've won them all ;-)
>>More seriously, good engineers are never a commodity. <<
Sorry, but you're still wrong. If you had said "not always" instead of "never," you would have been right. The fact is that in many markets, especially emerging markets, even good engineers are often a commodity.
Just as an example: I have a good friend who comes from China. He is an engineer and scientist, he is brilliant, and he is highly educated (two PhDs granted simultaneously from the College of Textiles at North Carolina State University). He has been described as "one in a million." The problem is that in China, being "one in a million" means there are a million others just like you. That's the definition of commodity :-)
>>In England and USA an engineer lack social prestige, the Germans, Scandinavians, Chinese and Japanese place them at the top of their society.<<
My German engineer wife (RWTH-Aachen) believed this when she came to the US to get a PhD. There is some grain of truth to it - at one point nearly everyone in the US was called an "engineer." The trash collector was called a "sanitation engineer," the bus driver was called a "transportation engineer," even housewives were called "domestic engineers." It did do further damage to the title, "Engineer," but not nearly as much as it would in an engineer-worship society. After a bit more than 10 years of living in the US, my wife now thinks the overarching worship of engineers that she was used to in her home country is silly.
But that's not really germane to your point. The real issue is this - in rigid, socialistic societies, class and social standing are very important. In the countries and regions you reference, most people are nothing more than the sum of their education and social position. Since engineers tend to be highly educated, their status in a rigid, socialistic society will tend to be high.
OTOH, in a more egalitarian society such social class distinctions are less important. People are not merely the sum of their education and social standing. In an egalitarian society, rags-to-riches success
stories are commonplace. In an egalitarian society, a high-school dropout with a desire to succeed can become a billionare. While this does occasionally happen in the socialistic countries, it is by comparison extremely rare.
So, don't make the self-serving, egotistical mistake of thinking that the US is inferior because we don't put engineers on a pedestal. They don't belong there any more than does any other skilled worker.
Follow Ups:
A commodity is a physical substance, such as food, grains, and metals, which is interchangeable with another product of the same type.
The keyword is "interchangeable"
A good engineer is not interchangeable, she/he has unique skills, so she/he is never a commodity.
These unique skills might not be in demand in the local market. So the price can go to zero. So no job, and a move to another market is needed. Like your friend.
The Scandinavian societies give free of charge first class university education to anybody, who pass entry skills tests.
As far as I know, Germany and Japan do the same.
So the rise to the top in Scandinavia is easier for the children of the poor persons, than in USA, where you have to pay a lot for the best universities.
The German engineering skills keep their export high in spite of the high Euro, because their products are not commodities.
I wonder why - do you enjoy embarrassing yourself? :-)
> > A commodity is a physical substance, such as food, grains, and metals, which is interchangeable with another product of the same type. < <
That is one definition. It is not the only definition. Skilled labor can also be a commodity. This includes skilled labor provided by engineers.
Ole, I know more about this subject than you. You're just an engineer :-)
You completely missed my point, even when I wrote it clearly.
The key word is "intercangeable" in any definition of commodity.
Skilled engineers and skilled MBAs are NOT interchangeable, and therefore NOT commodities.
In general people are not commodities, they are individuals.
A good manager knows that, and build a team based on the many skills needed.
But bad MBA managers think like you, and cause the current problems in USA.
I am truly sorry for the people, that have to work for you.
.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: