![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
70.187.189.182
Had my heart set on buying a flat screen. Went to Best Buy during the Aussie Tennis Open specifically to pick out a 50 inch flat. I fiqured that would be a good test since I watch alot of tennis on TV. What I noticed was trails behind the tennis ball. I left really disappointed that for 2 to 5k I couldn't watch my favorite sport.
Truthfully, I have not done my homework, but will over the next month. I would hope that I can find a product suitable.
Is this common?
Should I wait for better technology?
Follow Ups:
Displays that have a lower response time should exhibit less blur on fast moving objects.
Also, the displays in stores are often set to "torch mode" (picture settings maxed out) to give a "wow" factor in the showroom, and this can exacerbate the perception of motion "trails".
That said, LCD displays just don't respond as fast as CRTs, and will have more blur as a result.
Not sure how plasma displays stack up, but I suspect that they fall somewhere in betweeen.
SF
And I agree that the jacked-up contrast adds to a displays "trailing" qualities, especially LCD.
Which flat screens were you looking at?
Kal
Possibly the Pioneer Kuro PDP-5080 HD. Note that this was really just a cursory & emotionally based shopping adventure. I would never purchase w/out doing some homework.
Any display can look bad if the wrong signal or source material is feeding it.
-------------"I have found that if you love life, life will love you back." -Arthur Rubinstein (1887-1982)
I'm not much of a TV/Movie guy, but thought enjoying my favorite sport (tennis) on larger flat screen would be nice. There is nothing wrong with my 36 inch JVC, so I guess I'll hold off until the technology catches up with my interests. What a bummer!
While the motion was not ideal on close-up shots, it was fine for the average court-sports, and even better for most field-sports (baseball, football). The new kuro plasmas have a couple generations worth of advances over that early plasma. I don't see how anyone could have an issue with them.
-------------"I have found that if you love life, life will love you back." -Arthur Rubinstein (1887-1982)
Movies and TV are just too slow. Your old TV was small enough that
the problems weren't bothersome. But if it was possible to get a 50 inch CRT,
you'd have a problem.
So you have 2 different problems, not one. The limitations of the formats and the technologies that use them.
Limiting the size helps with both. I suggest nothing larger than 40 inches.
Look at plasma, but just the really good ones, they seem to handle motion better. Jazz Inmate just got a hi end Pioneer that he likes.
You could also look for a used Sony KV-34XBR910, a 34 inch CRT that is just a very nice TV to live with.
my Pioneer PDP4310 43" model plasma or my small LCD (Samsung) in the bedroom. Bigger units I seen do have trails but proper set-up can minimize them.
I don't know what I'm going to do when my SONY KV34XBR breaks.
LCD, DLP both suck in that respect.
I don't like the look of Plasma either. Compared to CRT.
I was a CRT fanatic as well, but finally got a Panasonic 50" plasma, and havent missed my old Sony Wega at all. I dont remember what, if anything, the CRT had that was superior. Maybe black level? If so its certainly not by much.
Then I'll see.
I must add that most stores show the units as the come out of the box. Certainly not the best image quality. They need to be tweeked using a calibration disc. I googled the settings for my Panasonic, and found the proper settings on the internet. First thing I did after turning on the power was to go through and adjust the settings. It makes quite a difference. Out of the box, most mfrs. have them set up too bright and vivid in color, trying to catch the eye of the typical browser.
I'd wait before buying.
The PRO-110FD destroyed the Panny and Sharp, in Home Theater magazine.
-------------"I have found that if you love life, life will love you back." -Arthur Rubinstein (1887-1982)
Kuros for thousands less.
I own a Panasonic 6 series plasma and, while it's an above average display, it can't compete with the Pioneer Kuros. And for the record, the 7 series Panasonics were only a very minor upgrade from the 6 series: still nowhere near the Kuros.
I got my kuro for $3200. How many thousands less are you talking about?
-------------"I have found that if you love life, life will love you back." -Arthur Rubinstein (1887-1982)
Except for some obvious differences, plasma is closer to CRT that any other display technology (SED isn't going to make it to market). In my opinion, the better plasmas made today are equal to CRT (in the good things that CRT is known for, there are plenty bad ones as well). By Q3/Q4, the better plasmas will surpass anything CRT was best at and by Q3/Q4 09, there will be no contender for picture quality compared to plasma -- except for possibly OLED.
We'll see. We have been promised a lot of good things for TV.
So far I haven't seen anything here yet.
I do hope your (excuse me. they) are right.
I don't like rainbows.
I can't stand all the focus shifts.
Pioneer extreme contrast concept
Pictures literally emerge from nowhere (there is no display glow like every other display technology exhibits, even the best calibrated CRT). The demo at CES floored everyone who got to see it: no one even knew there was another display in the room, a room that was virtually pitch black. Panasonic and Hitachi also will have this technology available to them (10 lumen tech), because they collaborated with Pioneer to "invent" it.
As nice as today's Kuros are, Pioneer's next gen models (not the 10 lumen tech models) will better their black levels by about 80%.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: