![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
68.164.95.160
In Reply to: RE: he made a valid point posted by Joe Murphy Jr on February 08, 2008 at 23:01:26
I don't know all the reasons the preamps cost more than receivers, but I think design has something to do with it. The Intergra has balanced outputs, and I'm not sure the cheaper receivers compare. And yes, I'm sure marketing does play a role. The separates market is more of an audiophile crowd. Those shopping for a receiver are a notch above the HT-in-a-box crowd.
-------------"I have found that if you love life, life will love you back." -Arthur Rubinstein (1887-1982)
Follow Ups:
Those shopping for a receiver are a notch above the HT-in-a-box crowd.
Could that be true?
As an owner of the Denon 5700 (now replaced by the 9.8 and separate amps), I can say that for the price of the new Denon receiver, one could purchase the 9.8 and an excellent multi-channel amp and likely outperform the Denon by some margin.
How good is the power supply in a "mainstream" reciever? For any component to deliver good sound or video, you have to have a good power supply.
Separates are the way to go, but the prices for the surround preamp/processors need to "go" as well -- down! There's no valid reason a decent surround preamp/processor (something like the Denon 2808-lite that I described) can't be offered for $800.
Most will opt for separates at that pricepoint.
-------------"I have found that if you love life, life will love you back." -Arthur Rubinstein (1887-1982)
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: