 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
69.3.11.88
In Reply to: RE: Do you mean sound via the analog outputs? posted by cfraser on June 23, 2009 at 18:49:59
Um... isn't an AVR a "digital processor box" ?
I've tried two different "analog" multichannel preamps both of which blew away my "digital" pre/pro for preamp stage performance. This is one reason I'd want to go with a source player w/ decent DACs in lieu of a new (expensive) HDMI-capable pre/pro whose MC preamp performance is not likely to match my current preamp.
Follow Ups:
It appears you are misinterpreting his comments.
Anyway, to clarify: I do not feed any analog source outputs into my AVR pre-pro. When I opened it up to have a look, it looks a helluva lot more like a computer than a "stereo". Not surprising. There are much better pre-pros of course, and those with some decent analog design, so then I wouldn't mind so much. But like many people here, I had an analog pre already, so I keep like with like signal-wise.
As far as this topic is concerned, my point was that keeping digital source material digital as long as possible throughout the reproduction chain seems a good idea to me. Easier and so convenient too with BDP output.
Seems to me feeding the MC analog preamp via the Blu-ray player's analog outputs is more "direct" than routing HDMI from the player to a pre/pro, then converting to analog, and then routing the analog outputs through the MC analog preamp (plus you will be "tainting" the sound with the "digital processor box's preamp stage).
Yes, of course! That's why I said I don't mind paying for GOOD analog output circuitry in the pre-pro. But "resented" paying for good analog output circuitry in the BDP, and for corresponding good analog input circuitry in the pre-pro...not needed with HDMI. Besides, most AVRs (what my pre-pro is) probably convert analog inputs back to digital anyway, since all the volume control circuitry etc. is digital. And...I want to use worthwhile things (IMO) like Audyssey...makes a big diff with movies I think...so might as well just leave digital sources' signals as digital until the final output stage. Bass management isn't nearly as good or flexible with BDP analog ouput...this should be enough reason to stay digital if you're picky. You may not like the idea, but when you get used to it, the HDMI works pretty well (the connectors are unnecessarily flimsy IMO) and is convenient, besides being overall quite flexible.I'm not sure what you mean in your second statement, but my digital pre does not really interface with my analog pre. Digital sources (BDP, DVDP, both HDMI, Ethernet music) go into digital pre, analog sources (tuner, tape, phono, CDP analog outputs and stereo DACs) go into analog pre. The L/R outputs of each pre go into one (front/stereo) amp (input used is selectable), the surround channels go into other amps.
If I had a really good modern pre-pro, I'd still use the HDMI BDP output. No reason not to from what I've seen (heard). For both music and video.
Edits: 06/29/09
Post a Followup:
| FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
