![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
108.209.17.221
is there one to avoid?
thanks
Phil
Follow Ups:
but for watching videos, it is A-OK!
5.1 and 7.1 receivers can all be set to 2 channels for music AND most DVD players can also play CD's
What is wrong with used? I got a nice Yamaha RX V100 for $93 at Goodwill ($1,000 new) It is unbelievable to me. No HDMI, but who needs that (Component cables for video and a coax cable for audio). This receiver is awesome. And I got a remote too. Save your money for good speakers (I use a Pinnacle center, Paradigm fronts, Mission rears and a 12" Definitive Tech sub)
I meant a Yamaha RX V1500...
i would likely purchase a new Yamaha RX-V375 from Amazon for $199.95 with free shipping.
This discussion got me looking at bottom-basement AV receivers. I am impressed with the features available at such a low price (my first receiver, a bare-bones Marantz purchased while in high school in 1970, cost me $112).
I have read reviews, owner comments, and user manuals to find out what I would prefer. I examined Yamaha, Denon, Pioneer, Harman/Kardon, Sherwood, Sony, and Onkyo (Marantz was priced too high). My two finalists were the Yamaha RX-V375 and the Denon AVR-E200 ($249 with free shipping from Amazon or $170 refurbished, plus shipping, from Accessories4less).
The British magazine What Hi-Fi said the Yamaha is the best receiver in its price class (see review in link below). Their praise for its sound quality, for me, is what gives it an edge over the Denon. I also prefer the Yamaha's speaker connectors for the main front channels, its larger volume readout on the front panel, and additional source inputs. The Yamaha is very impressive for only $199.95.
thanks again
You're welcome.
Hopefully the Yamaha RX-V375 performs as well as stated in the magazine review.
If you can, let us know some time if your friend is happy with the receiver.
I find it interesting too that there are all these solid choices of the different brands for about $200. I think the Yamaha was a good option. Let us know how this works out. Some of the more expensive units may be pricier mostly becausethey are overloaded with features you might not ever need or use. THe power output of the Yamaha is certainly more than adequate even for a large room.
Take your pick
http://www.amazon.com/Pioneer-VSX-522-K-5-Channel-Receiver-iPhone/dp/B007L8Q75G/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1393972971&sr=8-2&keywords=pioneer+5.1+receiver
http://www.amazon.com/Yamaha-RX-V375-Channel-Theater-Receiver/dp/B00B981F38/ref=sr_1_13?ie=UTF8&qid=1393973074&sr=8-13&keywords=pioneer+5.1+receiver
http://www.amazon.com/Sherwood-RD-5405-Receiver-Switching-Stereo/dp/B0038C5FWA/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1393973156&sr=8-1&keywords=sherwood+5.1+receiver
http://www.amazon.com/Denon-AVR-E200-Channel-Through-Receiver/dp/B00B7X2OW6/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1393973203&sr=8-2&keywords=denon+5.1+receiver
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-STR-DH540-Channel-Receiver-Black/dp/B00BHC7ZT4/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1393973294&sr=8-1&keywords=sony+5.1+receiver
http://www.amazon.com/Onkyo-TX-SR313-Channel-Theater-Receiver/dp/B0077V8930/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1393973343&sr=8-3&keywords=sony+5.1+receiver
All of these look like nice units. I have an older Pioneer, but in this group I sorta like the Yamaha or maybe the Sony.
No shortage of choices!
probably best to buy based on features and company past history
I see my buddy thur and will pass this on
thanks!
THere are small differences in features and setup, which would require some careful study. I have an inexpensive Pioneer that I bought several years ago, and I like that a lot. On a completely different system I have an inexpensive Sony, and I like that a lot oo, butthe two units are set up very differently. The Pioneer by far is the more complex, and it has more features. But the Sony sounds really really sweet.
THe companies that make these units are all quite solid.
David
http://www.accessories4less.com/make-a-store/item/denavr1312/denon-avr-1312-5.1-channel-a/v-home-theater-receiver/1.html
sad aesthetics, but if you buy from a major manufacturer you should still get a receiver that adequately performs the job for which it's intended. Case in point, I bought my son the cheapest Sherwood ( <$200) made 6 years ago. It's still doing the job and very nicely at that. Best friend just bought an inexpensive Yamaha ( <$300) and it sounds fine as well.
--------------------------
"I'd like to own a squadron of tanks"
...
And Alex has a good point, Accessories For Less has brand name gear, refurb'd, at great prices. You just want to make sure that refurb'd receiver is warranteed
--------------------------
"I'd like to own a squadron of tanks"
at this price range. I imagine there is not a heck of a lot of difference but it seems like the Sherwoods have a nice selection under $200 (pretty amazing really)
Also I know it can be important to know what to avoid just so you do not get a real dog...
--------------------------
"I'd like to own a squadron of tanks"
.
--------------------------
"I'd like to own a squadron of tanks"
...
They sell current and discontinued AV receivers that are refurbished. Many are deeply discounted and thus offer more features and power output than new units sold at or near retail. See the link below.
The Denon and Yamaha receivers there look tempting. Based on quite a few posts on the 'net about HDMI boards failing, I would avoid Onkyo's AV receivers at present.
As with any store, check the company's return and shipping cost policies.
possbily quite useful...
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: