|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
70.249.18.176
Well friends, this preordained blockbuster is as lame as one has come to expect, or rather fear, from a Michael Bay production. I sat through the whole film feeling a little like the Transformer who was 'lubricated' by the Witwicky pet chihuahua, but this isn't the first time this director has pissed me off.
In fact, this turned out to be one of those rare occasions when I wished that I'd purchased the Kong sized Frosty before the previews of coming attractions so that mid-way through the main feature I'd have a legitimate excuse to seek relief.
On the plus side, the effects were well done, as expected, as were some of the characters. This was unexpected because the acting is inconsistant. Very good performances by Rachel Taylor (Maggie) and Shia LaBeouf (Sam) as two teens drawn together by attraction and circumstance, along with Josh Duhamel (Sergeant Lennox) and his buddies brought back to Washington from the Middle East. The rest of the performances, with rare exception, sucked diesel fumes. The dialog was just too poorly written and painfully juvenile at times, especially the ridiculous behavior emanating from the Section 7 characters; in fact all of the government officials were either inept bunglers, cardboard stereotypes or comic relief buffoons.
The GOOD Transformers (Bumblebee, et al.) are hardly interesting enough to develop much sympathy and with all the monosyllabic posturing it started looking more like a WCW bout than a movie. In fact it's easier rooting for Megatron's 'boys' than Optimus Prime's, since Megatron has been placed in cold storage for government study so that the Feds can scavenge alien technology! Along this line I kept thinking how much more authentic and sympathetic Brad Bird's animated film Iron Giant was in comparison to this travesty.
Subjectively speaking, giving Transformers two stars on a 1-5 scale is generous based upon the caliber of it's special effects and the surprisingly believable chemistry between Sam & Maggie, the two fish-out-of-water teens. Their characters acquired an amazing amount of depth in a movie that treaded water, making this popcorn munching summer flick at least watchable over it's 2 hour and twenty minute duration.
I also must credit several of the not-so-goofy humorous scenes including the one where the soldiers on duty in the Middle East under Transformer attack have difficulty getting the phone call through to Washington (sorry, no spoilers). It's worth noting that the better moments in this movie survived in spite of the flimsy plot and somehow managed to avoid turning slapstick; unfortunately, too many scenes did turn slapstick.
BUT in fairness, when weighed against a relentless salvo of hokey scenes that reeked of over-the-top silliness like the Keystone Kop antics of John Turturro's Agent Simmons trying securing everything in the most faux macho manner possible, two stars is all I can muster. Crowds may be applauding at the end, but my gut reaction is that the audience's praise might just be gratitude that the film was finally over.
The bottom line is that Transformers did meet my expectations (for a Michael Bay film), but just barely, and my expectations were very low. ** / *****
Ciao,
AuPh
Follow Ups:
Went with my 11 year old daughter and she began yawning mid way thru.
Finally I said to hell with it and left early.
Must be a boy thing as the theatre was packed with 5-12 yearold boys and dads who seemed to be enjoying it.
Seeings how you have the mentality and humor of a 12 year old I'm surprised you didn't like it.
YECH
BTW, how are those prog-rock appreciation lessons going? ;0)
Cheers,
AuPh
I pretty much agree with your review. For me, like other bay movies, it has a great premise, a great start and slowly degraded into mindless action and cheap attempts at humor. Had this movie maintained the style and sense of realism of the opening transformer attack and gone on to develoip an interesting story arc it could have been amazing. Instead by the time it was done Bay had managed to nausiate me with a relentless barrage of effects that lacked style or substance but were filled literally with frenetic busyness to the point that you couldn't take anything in.
with the overall assessment I can totally understand your take on this film and a pre-negative bias against Michael Bay. I feel that the bias against the directors however tend to have forumers seeking fault in a extra special attentive way and tend to be more forgiving of directors they like.
Look this film has huge problems -- it's a good 25 minutes too long and most of that is in the final act where it's just monotonous. It has uneven performances some playing over the top others playing it dead serious, the transformers don't have a lot of lines which, judging by what they say, is probably a very good thing.
We're not a whole lot different on this film but I felt the charisma of the leads and the effects were enough to recommend it...I walked out with a smile and that ain't bad.
***/***** which is a marginal thumbs up.
Speaking of thumbs I think this film could have really been superb handled by a better director and better editing.
Roger Ebert IMO hits the review on the head PERFECTLY in my view
were terrific. I think the military against the Transformers was fun and pretty cool. Transformers against themselves got boring. The first 2/3 of the film I enjoyed quite a bit, enough to recommend it, but the end did drag and was a bit confusing - what did the cube do when inserted into the good Transformer? It did not matter as I was spent.
Overall a good time for those who care to see a Transformers movie to begin with.
By attempting to analyze the plot, you are breaking Rule Number One of a Michael Bay film.
The preferred watching method is to put brain into neutral at the start, and remain there for the entirety, Being Entertained.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: