![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
24.91.201.174
In Reply to: RE: We watched Empire of the Sun last night on a 104" screen. Was I impressed? posted by patrickU on August 31, 2007 at 09:13:17
I agree with you. A failure along with "Always" and "1941". "AI", too.
Follow Ups:
"Hollywoooood," as exclaimed by the Japanese submariner as he looks up
the conning tower at what can only be the naked beaver of the babe
straddling the periscope. Worth the price of admission. Regards,
J.R.
Disagree. I liked it a lot. As clarkjohnsen said, less 'Spielbergian' than the vast majority of his other films. Was it on a par with 'Schindlers List'? No. But it was head and shoulders above most of his other 'serious' films such as 'Munich' or even 'Private Ryan'.
And who doesn't like seeing low-level P-51s shot on 35mm film?
Cadillac of the skies.
You mean Lamborghini or Ferrari, right?
Quote from the movie. Though you probably know that.
Ferrari or Porsche might be my frame of reference. I would never, though, call the P-51 the 'Toyota of the skies'. (-:
1941 could have been such a good film, I thought that with passing time it could improve, so I gave it many a new try.
Why did it not work out?
I never found out beside the name -boring--
and fails too as a Comedy, if Spielberg had made more effort to aim at making it either one thing or the other it could have worked a lot better
Apparently a painstaking recreation of how Los Angeles looked at that time; even the plane John Belushi flies is the correct type with the correct markings for a coastal squadron in that area at that time
I'm a car buff and there isn't a single post-1941 vehicle in the whole film....
Grins
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: