 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
71.163.59.38
In Reply to: RE: Bergman's greatness could have been just so in theater. He's not posted by tinear on September 02, 2007 at 05:16:54
...I think his greatness is magnificently cinematic. I also suspect that you post this largely to be provocative, because you know so many people will disagree with you. It's not your opinion that's a problem for me; of course you don't have to like Bergman.In other words, in my opinion what you're saying is a little silly in the context of the general regard for Bergman's work around the world. If he's really that un-filmic how could he be even a good filmmaker? Your assertion requires that countless others who hold his work in such high regard would be somehow *wrong*. It just doesn't get you or the discussion anywhere interesting.
If you are really just interested in a lively discussion of the topic you brought up, why not just say: "let's discuss the relation between Bergman the theater director and Bergman the filmmaker. I find his films to be rather theatrical in a way that bothers me. I don't think he's cinematic enough. What do you guys think?"
I submit that this would get you more substantive replies to the question you raise than your short, rather glib introductory post. As you can see most of the posts have been brief rebuttals without specifics. Wouldn't you prefer a more exploratory and wide-ranging discussion of the topic?
Edits: 09/02/07Follow Ups:
born... you or sjb.
My point is that Antonioni, Kubrick, Welles and countless others never could have had their seminal works easily and satisfyingly transferred almost of a whole to the stage but the works of Bergman largely (not the qualifier) could.
I might add that Bergman's women singularly are the most unattractive group I've ever seen with the exception of a gathering of women track team members once I witnessed--- but I digress.
I'm sure, clever lad you are, that you realize excellent cinematography, which usually is the case with Ingmar, has nothing to do with my point.
Lastly, some fellows such as yourself feel that one must post in a graduate student or other such patois to be taken seriously by... those such as yourself.
Well, E, this isn't a narcoleptic forum, is it?
...I hope I can resist the urge to reply to any more of your posts. Now he's being criticized because his women aren't pretty enough? You really don't realize how incredibly superficial you show yourself to be when you say stuff like that, do you?
features a small town school in Israel that has gathered thousands of thumbtacks which they have inserted into an effigy of George W. Bush, each one representing a Palestinians' death in the their struggle for freedom?
*
a
.
Nasty fellow that I am I've posted off to you a Brasilian bombshell.
.
purty much!
"You can safely assume you have created God in your own image when he hates all the same people you do."
...but I'm not sure. But I can tell you I sure like your post's tag line!
The tag line is a quote from an author named Anne Lamott.
"You can safely assume you have created God in your own image when he hates all the same people you do."
I've been interested in reading Lamott but never have. Anything in particular you recommend?
only discovered that quote a few weeks ago and made it my tag line but haven't read any of her stuff... though I'm interested.
I did find this link of archived articles by her earlier this evening...
"You can safely assume you have created God in your own image when he hates all the same people you do."
| FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
