![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
58.110.47.236
In Reply to: RE: So, you didn't see the Daniel Craig film? posted by mr grits on September 27, 2007 at 15:54:37
... and I thought the plot unintelligible.
The villain sold the shares which didn't fall in price so he lost the money... oh wait, he didn't lose the money so he could have just paid it back.
But apparently forgot he had it and thought a game of cards the best way out.
It makes a lot of the other seem half plausible.
Is this what we have come to? A Bond film about a game of cards.
Shame the girl realised how to work the heart machine or we could have all gone home early.
Follow Ups:
Nor would have Africa nor Venice figured into it either. Flemming's world was the 50's and early 60's until the money-machine got hold of it.
.
Complicit Constapo Talibangelical since MMIII
Fleming's world, or Bond's world if you prefer was a cold war world as opposed to the vague enemies/baddies in the current crop of Bond films.
They are probably closer to Greene and may now be more accurately described as historical.
I find it hard to be involved in them. JUst like the Mission Impossible films, I fail to understand why they are tagged on to this other thing which has nothing to do with them. You might just as well call them SUperman for all the connection to the original.
The franchise is fucked.
The BOOK was about a game of cards.
addictively watch and be massively entertained by cable poker...
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: