 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
207.67.53.106
In Reply to: RE: Which Elizabeth do we prefer? Blanchett or Mirren? posted by mr grits on October 05, 2007 at 09:28:18
...I can't say and I would never judge any actor's performance from a trailer.
They are both stellar actors, in different projects, for different mediums, with different directors and screenplays.
So it's more than just a matter of interpretation.
At this point, I'd have to say they are equally formidable peformances (remember, Blanchette did Liz once already for this same direcrtor). It may just come done to which project I prefer.
I'll let you know when GO comes out.
Follow Ups:
Not based on acting merit but on the way the character was interpreted. I like the more stolid, dramatic portrayal of Elizabeth by Blanchett yet Mirren may have actually captured Liz as more of a woman than a Queen.
.
Complicit Constapo Talibangelical since MMIII
...both. Really.
Two completely confident performances in very different types of dramatisations.
I don't think I would actually charactarize Blanchette's Liz as "stolid". We see quite an emotional Elizabeth, even an insecure Elizabeth through much of the film til she gains her confidence as queen.
It's more a difference of dramatic emphasis between the two films - I actually think the Mirren project has a more "reality" based feel than the film Elizabeth.
How are you BTW, great to have you back! ( for a while..)
I think that Blanche is great as doing impersonification but only on the " see and feels " grade/ level.
While Mirren goes down to the core. ( Look at her in Elisabeth I!)
Extraordinary.
Poor cathy just gone any chance to do so...
Another world.
It's the material - an actor can only work with the script they're given. "Elizabeth" was as deep as a dime. I thought Cate did a great job in creating an interesting Liz...gripping to watch in as far as went.
I blame the filmmaker, not the actor.
And thank you for the welcome back - I've missed the gang. iit's been a tough year with 2 deaths of people closest to me...my father and my foster brother...19 months of hospitals, care giving, nursing homes and hospice, one after the other.
It's probably one reason I enjoyed Death At A Funeral so Much - I'm ready to laugh again.
... Marie Antoinette.
The you could see like with like.
Lightweight with lightweight.
But an actor choose his material too. I always wonder why so many people did loved " Elisabeth ", I never could go fully through for a second time.
Ah! What can I say, like in a film look at MY scars...Our daughter passed away last year almost from one day to the other, two weeks ago our beloved dog, three years, did not make it after a minor surgery in his eyes, and suffocated when waking up, even we choose the best doctor with the most modern equipment, and three years ago while with our son visiting a friend, our puppy dog fell out the window and broke her back...
Want to ear more?
And I can still feel the pain from others, is that not good?
- Welcome back!
Cate was just getting started and this was one of her first films...plus it did get her a lot of attention, on Oscar nom, and better roles.
There are only so many great roles in great projects at any given year, and not a lot of them are for women.
If asked which film would you recommend with a glorious role starting her?
That would be pain, would it be not?
Lord of the Ring or Charlotte Gray?
But donīt put me in a corner that is not mine! I like her!!!
Now if you look from this perspective about women in the film industry or elswhere, I can only tell you that if I were one, I would go on the streets and throw some stones in some windows....
This men society is a shame.
Oscar & Lucinda, The Aviator, or Notes On A Scandal.
Cate has never been in a movie commensurate with her talent.
On stage is another story apparently, but most of us will never get to see her in theater.
Cate has never been in a movie commensurate with her talent.
That close our discussion, as it is my absolute feeling too. With the annotation that SHE choose her roles.
I think Kate Winslet has been better served in this aspect.
I, personally, am accustomed to seeing and feeling more comfortable with Elizabeth not Liz. Liz was almost too human (even if she really was) to be a good Queen.
.
Complicit Constapo Talibangelical since MMIII
Cate is a copycat, an excellent one...
.
Complicit Constapo Talibangelical since MMIII
...that's really old news.
I assumed the OP was talking about this in reference to "Elizabeth: The Golden Age" coming out shortly which is the Part Deaux of the original Elizabeth of which you speak. Also stars Geoffrey Rush from first films and Clive Owen.
So based on the first E film to me the two performances are like comparing apples and oranges.
But if I got excited ever time AMPAS screwed up I'd have died of apoplexy long ago, lol. Yes, Cate shold have won.
| FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
