![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
58.110.33.9
In Reply to: RE: Michael Moore came under false premise, to interview him, a real shame-- posted by patrickU on April 06, 2008 at 05:33:22
... to publish your political dislike of Moore.
Heston used his public standing to gain (supposedly) good PR for the NRA and as such was an acceptable target for an interview.
If Heston was unable to handle the situation, then that was his problem.
He never had a problem when the publicity situation went with him.
Follow Ups:
to you you should probably get yourself checked out for it as well. That is the problem people have with Moore. He was attacking an old man in the early stages of Alzheimer's and as the son of a man who died from that disease i will tell you, if i that had been my Father and I came in on that scene you'd be talking about Mr. Moore in the past tense.
.
On an unrelated note,I wonder if as a Lawyer you could tell me weather one can be cited for speeding after the fact from civilian video taken of a driver while following at equal thus also illegal speed. Say someone took a video of you exceeding the speed limit on an Interstate . The only way to place a measurement on the subject car would of course be to show the speed of the car from which the video was taken which would of course have to also be in excess of the speed limit. Is such a video ever accepted and used as evidence to cite a driver successfully for speeding? Thanks.
but this was done in bad taste. It was too much. The idea is to make your point but not brutalize another human. It made MM look like the jerk. And now that CH is dead it seems he was picking on a guy who was past his prime and not able to defend himself.
OTOH I was perfectly content when he referred to George W as a fictisious president at the Oscar ceremonies. I strongly agree.
C'mon on in!!!
Well that's a relief then. I thought it might have been something serious!
yes.
I dislike MM and never made a secret of it, did I not...
And no it was not his problem, an unfair act is an unfair act.
... apart from your political views.
Because it is you the " me " you want me to be.
this is a language thing, I know both of you, you have very similar views, this is just misunderstanding.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: