![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
93.194.200.217
In Reply to: RE: That last line is troubling. nt posted by tinear on August 17, 2008 at 08:32:52
Have you seen the film?
Well I had to see it as said above in French, now on the whole the words tend to state that a good Indian is one who is no more there..
Now we will wait for the comments...
" Mieux vaut une tęte bien faite qu'une tęte bien pleine."
Follow Ups:
It's hard to understand your comments but, if you mean the characters made those anti-Native-American comments, it's understandable. If it seemed the film portrayed the Natives as many traditional American films did, that's reprehensible in light of when L D was made.
At the time of the making it should have been more differenciated, I fully agree.
" Mieux vaut une tęte bien faite qu'une tęte bien pleine."
Cool site.
So they shouldn't portray the era of the story as it was?
If they'd soft peddled the treatment of NA's you'd criticize it for being a whitewash and not revealing how horribly they were treated.
"I looked the man in the eye. I found him to be very straightforward and trustworthy….I was able to get a sense of his soul." -- George W. Bush on Vladimir Putin
If NA are portrayed as "savage," less human than the cowboys, then it's reprehensible. Some Hollywood directors of the "old days" actually respected Indians and it's obvious. Others only portrayed caricatures.
Why do you persist in thinking the worst, s?
Well the unfortunate fact is that if any people were savages the Comanches and Kiowas were. They were cruel predators and brigands and the conflict between them and the Texans had the nature of a vendetta.
The northern Indians who killed Gus weren't portrayed in a negative light.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: